Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 12:17:1827-1839.
doi: 10.2147/CCID.S474422. eCollection 2024.

Exploring the Bidirectional Effects of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids on Urticaria Subtypes Through Mendelian Randomization and Mediation Analysis

Affiliations

Exploring the Bidirectional Effects of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids on Urticaria Subtypes Through Mendelian Randomization and Mediation Analysis

Xianjun Xiao et al. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence links gut microbiota and their by-products, notably short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), to urticaria. This study employs multiple Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses to unravel the complex interactions among gut microbiota, SCFAs, and different subtypes of urticaria, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and enhance future clinical research.

Methods: We analyzed published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics to identify associations between gut microbiota and three common subtypes of urticaria: spontaneous, dermatographic, and temperature-triggered. Initial two-sample and reverse MR analyses explored the causality in these relationships. Subsequent multivariate MR analyses investigated the role of SCFAs in modulating these interactions, with multiple sensitivity analyses to ensure robustness.

Findings: Specific taxa were differently associated with various urticaria subtypes. From microbiota to urticaria: one taxon was negatively associated with dermatographic urticaria; seven taxa were negatively associated and four positively associated with temperature-triggered urticaria; four taxa were negatively associated and six positively associated with spontaneous urticaria. Conversely, from urticaria to microbiota: five taxa were negatively associated with dermatographic urticaria; four were negatively and two positively associated with temperature-triggered urticaria; and two were negatively associated with spontaneous urticaria. These associations were observed at a nominal significance level (P < 0.05). After applying Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, these associations did not reach statistical significance. The observed trends, however, provide insights into potential microbiota-urticaria interactions. Multivariate MR analyses elucidated the role of SCFAs, particularly acetate, which plays a crucial role in modulating immune response. Adjusting for acetate revealed direct effects of Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, and Bifidobacteriaceae on spontaneous urticaria, with corresponding mediation effects of -22%, -24.9%, and -24.9% respectively. Similarly, adjustments for Alcaligenaceae and Betaproteobacteria indicated significant negative effects of acetate on dermatographic and spontaneous urticaria, with mediation effects of -21.7% and -23.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: This study confirms the interconnected roles of gut microbiota, SCFAs, and urticaria. It highlights SCFAs' potential mediating role in influencing urticaria through microbiota, providing insights for future therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization; gut microbiota; gut-skin axis; short-chain fatty acids; urticaria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The schematic representation of the study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Circo heatmap of significant MR results (gut microbiota to urticaria phenotypes).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Circo heatmap of significant MR results (urticaria to gut microbiota phenotypes).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The schematic representation of the summary of the key findings.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kolkhir P, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Kulthanan K, Peter J, Metz M, Maurer M. Urticaria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):61. doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00389-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goncalo M, Gimenez-Arnau A, Al-Ahmad M, et al. The global burden of chronic urticaria for the patient and society. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):226–236. doi:10.1111/bjd.19561 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, et al. The international EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022;77(3):734–766. doi:10.1111/all.15090 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Itakura A, Tani Y, Kaneko N, Hide M. Impact of chronic urticaria on quality of life and work in Japan: results of a real-world study. J Dermatol. 2018;45(8):963–970. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.14502 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolkhir P, Munoz M, Asero R, et al. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(6):1819–1831. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.04.010 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82105026, Nos. 82205283 and Nos. 82305410), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (No. 2024NSFSC0728) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2022MD723719 and Nos. 2021MD693787).

LinkOut - more resources