Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 9:17:3443-3452.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S477053. eCollection 2024.

Using XGBoost for Predicting In-Stent Restenosis Post-DES Implantation: Role of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Residual Cholesterol

Affiliations

Using XGBoost for Predicting In-Stent Restenosis Post-DES Implantation: Role of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Residual Cholesterol

Ling Hou et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate their correlation and predictive utility for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: We collected medical records of 668 patients who underwent PCI treatment from January 2022 to December 2022. Based on follow-up results (ISR defined as luminal narrowing ≥ 50% on angiography), all participants were divided into ISR and non-ISR groups. The XGBoost machine learning (ML) model was employed to identify the optimal predictive variables from a set of 31 variables. Discriminatory ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), while calibration and performance of the prediction models were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test and calibration plots. Clinical utility of each model was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: In the XGBoost importance ranking of predictive factors, LMR and RC ranked first and fourth, respectively. The AUC of the entire XGBoost ML model was 0.8098, whereas the model using traditional stepwise backward regression, comprising five predictive factors, had an AUC of 0.706. The XGBoost model showed superior predictive performance with a higher AUC, indicating better discrimination and predictive accuracy for ISR compared to traditional methods.

Conclusion: LMR and RC are identified as cost-effective and reliable biomarkers for predicting ISR risk in ACS patients following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. LMR and RC represent cost-effective and reliable biomarkers for predicting ISR risk in ACS patients following drug-eluting stent implantation. Enhances the accuracy and clinical utility of ISR prediction models, offering clinicians a robust tool for risk stratification and personalized patient management.

Keywords: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; XGBoost; drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; machine learning; residual cholesterol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The selective procession of the participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative Importance of the Top 10 Variables Included in the XG Boost ML Model for In-Stent Restenosis in the Training Set.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The AUC of the prediction model for ISR by stepwise LR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The AUC of the prediction model for ISR by XG Boost ML.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The calibration plots of the training set by LR.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The calibration plots of the training set by XG Boost ML.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The DCA of the model using LR.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The DCA of the model using XG Boost ML.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–e639. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018;391(10124):939–948. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30423-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giustino G, Colombo A, Camaj A, et al. Coronary in-stent restenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(4):348–372. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farhan S, Redfors B, Maehara A, et al. Relationship between insulin resistance, coronary plaque, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the PROSPECT study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12933-020-01207-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alfonso F, Coughlan JJ, Giacoppo D, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Management of in-stent restenosis. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(2):e103–e123. doi:10.4244/eij-d-21-01034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

This work was funded by Technology Support Project of Enshi Prefecture Science and Technology Bureau (D20200018).

LinkOut - more resources