Hypoallergenic Knee Implant Usage and Clinical Outcomes: Are They Safe and Effective?
- PMID: 39139362
- PMCID: PMC11320431
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101399
Hypoallergenic Knee Implant Usage and Clinical Outcomes: Are They Safe and Effective?
Abstract
Background: One of the most debated topics in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the impact of metal hypersensitivity (MH) as a potential cause of prosthesis failure. Implanting hypoallergenic prostheses to avoid potential problems in suspected cases of MH is one treatment option that can be used in such cases. However, their long-term clinical safety and efficacy are not well proven.
Methods: All literature relevant to modern hypoallergenic implants were reviewed and summarized to provide a comprehensive synopsis. In addition, a detailed literature search was performed on PUBMED, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar to identify all the clinical studies reporting outcomes for hypoallergenic knee implants. Our search was confined to those studies published as full manuscripts in the English language from July 2018 to July 2023.
Results: To minimize the risk of MH, new implant variants have been developed which are either under clinical evaluation or in routine clinical use. These include conventional metal implants with protective coatings (mono- or multilayer) and metal-free implants. However, there is insufficient clinical data to confirm the rationale and effectiveness of using these "hypoallergenic" TKA implants.
Conclusions: Published studies and arthroplasty registry data analyses indicate no significant differences between hypoallergenic and standard TKAs with overall good survival rates. In the future, further high-quality studies are needed to better understand the complexity of this subject.
Keywords: Allergy; Hypersensitivity; Hypoallergenic implants; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement.
© 2024 The Authors.
Similar articles
-
Do Patients With Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants for Metal Allergy Do Worse? An Analysis of Health Care Utilizations and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Jul 15. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 37454947
-
"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants.".Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):839-851. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06775-6. Epub 2021 Oct 29. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 34714355 Review.
-
Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach.Bone Jt Open. 2021 Oct;2(10):785-795. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0098.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2021. PMID: 34587776 Free PMC article.
-
Metal wear debris generation in primary total knee arthroplasty: is it an issue?Acta Orthop Belg. 2021 Dec;87(4):681-695. doi: 10.52628/87.4.13. Acta Orthop Belg. 2021. PMID: 35172435
-
Patellar resurfacing was not associated with a clinically significant advantage when a modern patellar friendly total knee arthroplasty is employed: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee. 2023 Mar;41:329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 22. Knee. 2023. PMID: 36827957 Review.
References
-
- Erivan R., Tardieu A., Villatte G., Ollivier M., Jacquet C., Descamps S., et al. Knee surgery trends and projections in France from 2008 to 2070. J Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106:893–902. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources