Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 6.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01406-x. Online ahead of print.

Designing a Measurement Feedback System for Personality Disorders: Should Outcome Monitoring be Based on Symptom Severity or Personality Functioning?

Marieke van Geffen  1   2 , Hester V Eeren  3 , Joost Hutsebaut  4 , Odette Brand-de Wilde  5
Affiliations

Designing a Measurement Feedback System for Personality Disorders: Should Outcome Monitoring be Based on Symptom Severity or Personality Functioning?

Marieke van Geffen et al. Adm Policy Ment Health. .

Abstract

Measurement feedback systems (MFS) providing insight in treatment progress can improve mental healthcare outcomes. However, there is no uniform measurement feedback system that could be used to measure treatment progress for personality disorders (PD). This study compared two types of measures: a generic measure for symptom severity (Brief Symptom Index, BSI) and a specific measure for personality functioning (Severity Indices of Personality Problems, SIPP) at different points in time in order to provide insight in the most suitable measuring moment for a MFS for PD. This study is conducted in a sample of 996 Dutch PD patients (mean age 33.51 (SD 10.42), 73.1% female). Symptom severity and personality functioning were assessed before and multiple times during treatment, using a timespan of 24 months. Outcomes were examined over time using multilevel modeling. Symptom severity (generic measure) and personality functioning (specific measure) improved equally after 24 months. However, during these 24 months, different patterns of change were observed for symptom severity compared to severity of personality problems. In general, symptom severity decreased most during the 1st months of treatment, whereas personality functioning improved only after 6 months of treatment. A generic instrument of symptom severity is able to measure early changes in symptom distress but may not be able to measure longer term changes in personality functioning. The authors discuss policy implications for benchmarking using specific measures in the treatment of personality disorders.

Keywords: Benchmarking; Feedback systems; Personality disorders; Personality functioning; Symptom severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Arnevik, E., Wilberg, T., Monsen, J. T., Andrea, H., & Karterud, S. (2009). A cross-national validity study of the severity indices of personality problems (SIPP-118). Personality and Mental Health, 3, 41–55. - DOI
    1. Barendregt, M. (2015). Benchmarken en andere functies van ROM: Back to basics. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 57(7), 517–525. - PubMed
    1. Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2004). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Mentalization-based treatment. Oxford University Press. - DOI
    1. Bayney, R. (2005). Benchmarking in mental health: An introduction for psychiatrists. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(4), 305–314. - DOI
    1. Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources