How green is my reusable bronchoscope?
- PMID: 39089450
- DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101420
How green is my reusable bronchoscope?
Abstract
Introduction: Single-use bronchoscopes have replaced reusable ones in many institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the environmental and financial impacts of both strategies: reusable and single-use bronchoscopes.
Material and methods: We conducted a pragmatic study in a 21-bed polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. The eco-audit consisted of estimating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, considering the life cycle of each strategy. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to construction, packaging, transport and waste elimination were compared between 2 devices: the reusable bronchoscope, a Pentax® FI-16RBS that was disinfected twice daily; and the single-use bronchoscope, the bronchoflex agile® from TSC.
Results: For the reusable bronchoscope, GHG emissions were marginally impacted by the number of bronchoscopies performed (from 185 kg eq.CO2 per year to 192 kg eq.CO2 for 10 or 110 bronchoscopies per year). For the reusable device, GHG emissions directly depended on the number of bronchoscopies performed with 3.82 kg eq.CO2 emitted per bronchoscopy. The breakeven point for the reusable bronchoscope was estimated at 50 bronchoscopies in terms of GHG emissions and 96 bronchoscopies for financial considerations.
Conclusion: Considering current practice in our ICU, reusable bronchoscopes have lower GHG emissions when used more than 50 times a year and a lower cost when used more than 96 times a year as compared with single-use bronchoscopes.
Keywords: Bronchoscopy; Life cycle assessment; critical care; global warming.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433. Waste Manag Res. 2008. PMID: 18338699 Review.
-
Single-use flexible bronchoscopes compared with reusable bronchoscopes: Positive organizational impact but a costly solution.J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):528-535. doi: 10.1111/jep.12904. Epub 2018 Mar 23. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018. PMID: 29573067
-
Operator Perception of a Single-Use Flexible Bronchoscope: Comparison With Current Standard Bronchoscopes.Respir Care. 2020 Nov;65(11):1655-1662. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07574. Epub 2020 Jun 2. Respir Care. 2020. PMID: 32487752
-
A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes.Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr;75(4):529-540. doi: 10.1111/anae.14891. Epub 2019 Nov 8. Anaesthesia. 2020. PMID: 31701521 Free PMC article.
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources