Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0045824.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00458-24. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

The diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections

Affiliations

The diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections

Xiaohang Hu et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an unbiased and rapid method for detecting pathogens. This study enrolled 145 suspected severe pneumonia patients who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University. This study primarily aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples for detecting pathogens. Our findings indicated that mNGS performed significantly higher sensitivity (97.54% vs 28.68%, P < 0.001), coincidence (90.34% vs 35.17%, P < 0.001), and negative predictive value (80.00% vs 13.21%, P < 0.001) but performed lower specificity than CMTs (52.17% vs 87.5%, P < 0.001). Streptococcus pneumoniae as the most common bacterial pathogen had the largest proportion (22.90%, 30/131) in this study. In addition to bacteria, fungi, and virus, mNGS can detect a variety of atypical pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculous. Mixed infections were common in patients with severe pneumonia, and bacterial-fungal-viral-atypical pathogens were the most complicated infection. After adjustments of antibiotics based on mNGS and CMTs, the clinical manifestation improved in 139 (95.86%, 139/145) patients. Our data demonstrated that mNGS had significant advantage in diagnosing respiratory tract infections, especially atypical pathogens and fungal infections. Pathogens were detected timely and comprehensively, contributing to the adjustments of antibiotic treatments timely and accurately, improving patient prognosis and decreasing mortality potentially.IMPORTANCEMetagenomic next-generation sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid can provide more comprehensive and accurate pathogens for respiratory tract infections, especially when considering the previous usage of empirical antibiotics before admission or complicated clinical presentation. This technology is expected to play an important role in the precise application of antimicrobial drugs in the future.

Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; conventional microbiological tests; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; respiratory tract infections; severe pneumonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Treatment outcomes of patients with monobacterial infections and mixed infections, the cure rate, and the 3-month survival rate of the monobacterial infections group were higher than those of the mixed infections group; the 3-month survival rate had statistical difference between the two groups.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Overlap of main detected pathogens of mixed and monomicrobial infections using mNGS and CMTs. Detection efficiency of mNGS and CMTs for specific pathogens is different.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The comparison of sensitivity, specificity, coincidence, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between mNGS and CMTs.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Concordance of diagnosis between mNGS and CMTs. (A) Ninety-three cases (64.14%, 93/145) were both positive, 13 cases (8.97%, 13/145) were negative for both methods, and 2 cases (1.38%, 2/145) were positive by CMTs only. (B) In the mixed infections group, 25 cases (32.89%, 25/76) were both positive and 51 cases (67.11%, 51/76) were positive by mNGS only. (C) In the monobacterial infections group, 12 cases (21.82%, 12/55) were both positive and 2 cases (3.64%, 2/55) were both negative. (D) Among the 37 double-positive cases, 30 cases (81.08%, 30/37) were matched, 5 cases (13.51%, 5/37) were partially matched, and 2 cases (5.41, 2/37) were completely mismatched.

Similar articles

References

    1. Niederman MS, Torres A. 2022. Respiratory infections. Eur Respir Rev 31:220150. doi:10.1183/16000617.0150-2022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundell N, Andersson LM, Brittain-Long R, Sundvall PD, Alsiö Å, Lindh M, Gustavsson L, Westin J. 2019. PCR detection of respiratory pathogens in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. J Clin Microbiol 57:e00716-18. doi:10.1128/JCM.00716-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu YG, Tang XD, Lu YT, Zhang J, Qu JM. 2018. Contemporary situation of community-acquired pneumonia in China: a systematic review. J Transl Int Med 6:26–31. doi:10.2478/jtim-2018-0006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langelier C, Kalantar KL, Moazed F, Wilson MR, Crawford ED, Deiss T, Belzer A, Bolourchi S, Caldera S, Fung M, et al. . 2018. Integrating host response and unbiased microbe detection for lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in critically ill adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E12353–E12362. doi:10.1073/pnas.1809700115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu BM, Beck EM, Fisher MA. 2021. The brief case: ventilator-associated corynebacterium accolens pneumonia in a patient with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol 59:e0013721. doi:10.1128/JCM.00137-21 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources