Metabolomics of repetitive myocardial stunning in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis: Effect of non-selective and selective β1-receptor blockers
- PMID: 38885335
- PMCID: PMC11284965
- DOI: 10.1113/JP285720
Metabolomics of repetitive myocardial stunning in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis: Effect of non-selective and selective β1-receptor blockers
Abstract
Chronic coronary artery stenosis can lead to regional myocardial dysfunction in the absence of myocardial infarction by repetitive stunning, hibernation or both. The molecular mechanisms underlying repetitive stunning-associated myocardial dysfunction are not clear. We used non-targeted metabolomics to elucidate responses to chronically stunned myocardium in a canine model with and without β-adrenergic blockade treatment. After development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction induced by ameroid constrictors on the coronary arteries, animals were randomized to 3 months of placebo, metoprolol or carvedilol. We compared these two β-blockers with their different β-adrenergic selectivities on myocardial function, perfusion and metabolic pathways involved in tissue undergoing chronic stunning. Control animals underwent sham surgery. Dysfunction in stunned myocardium was associated with reduced fatty acid oxidation and enhanced ketogenic amino acid metabolism, together with alterations in mitochondrial membrane phospholipid composition. These changes were consistent with impaired mitochondrial function and were linked to reduced nitric oxide and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signalling, resulting in a decline in adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase. Mitochondrial changes were ameliorated by carvedilol more than metoprolol, and improvement was linked to nitric oxide and possibly hydrogen sulphide signalling. In summary, repetitive myocardial stunning commonly seen in chronic multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with adverse metabolic remodelling linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and specific signalling pathways. These changes are reversed by β-blockers, with the non-selective inhibitor having a more favourable impact. This is the first investigation to demonstrate that β-blockade-associated improvement of ventricular function in chronic myocardial stunning is associated with restoration of mitochondrial function. KEY POINTS: The mechanisms responsible for the metabolic changes associated with repetitive myocardial stunning seen in chronic multivessel coronary artery disease have not been fully investigated. In a canine model of repetitive myocardial stunning, we showed that carvedilol, a non-selective β-receptor blocker, ameliorated adverse metabolic remodelling compared to metoprolol, a selective β1-receptor blocker, by improving nitric oxide synthase and adenosine monophosphate protein kinase function, enhancing calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, probably increasing hydrogen sulphide, and suppressing cyclic-adenosine monophosphate signalling. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation alterations were ameliorated by carvedilol to a larger extent than metoprolol; this improvement was linked to nitric oxide and possibly hydrogen sulphide signalling. Both β-blockers improved the cardiac energy imbalance by reducing metabolites in ketogenic amino acid and nucleotide metabolism. These results elucidated why metabolic remodelling with carvedilol is preferable to metoprolol when treating chronic ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction caused by repetitive myocardial stunning.
Keywords: AMPK; chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy; myocardial stunning; non‐targeted metabolomics; β‐blockers.
© 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2024 The Physiological Society.
Similar articles
-
Selective versus nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure: differential effects on myocardial energy substrate utilization.Eur J Heart Fail. 2005 Jun;7(4):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.04.015. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005. PMID: 15921803 Clinical Trial.
-
Carvedilol improves myocardial contractility compared with metoprolol in patients with chronic hibernating myocardium after revascularization.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Sep;10(3):181-90. doi: 10.1177/107424840501000306. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2005. PMID: 16211207 Clinical Trial.
-
Different effects of carvedilol, metoprolol, and propranolol on left ventricular remodeling after coronary stenosis or after permanent coronary occlusion in rats.Circulation. 2002 Feb 26;105(8):975-80. doi: 10.1161/hc0802.104503. Circulation. 2002. PMID: 11864928
-
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta blockers in heart failure.Heart Fail Rev. 2004 Apr;9(2):131-7. doi: 10.1023/B:HREV.0000046368.08825.20. Heart Fail Rev. 2004. PMID: 15516861 Review.
-
Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 1.Circulation. 2001 Dec 11;104(24):2981-9. doi: 10.1161/hc4801.100038. Circulation. 2001. PMID: 11739316 Review.
References
-
- Barba I, Andrés M & Garcia-Dorado D (2019). Metabolomics and heart diseases: from basic to clinical approach. Curr Med Chem 26, 46–59. - PubMed
-
- Book WM (2002). Carvedilol: a nonselective β blocking agent with antioxidant properties. CHF 8, 173–177. - PubMed
-
- Cheng S, Shah SH, Corwin EJ, Fiehn O, Fitzgerald RL, Gerszten RE, Illig T, Rhee EP, Srinivas PR, Wang TJ & Jain M (2017). Potential impact and study considerations of metabolomics in cardiovascular health ad disease. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 10, pii: e000032. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Choy PC, Chan M, Hatch G & Man RYK (1992). Phosphatidylcholine metabolism in ischemic and hypoxic hearts. Mol Cell Biochem 116, 53–58. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources