Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 13;409(1):186.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03375-z.

The PLET (Portable Laparoscopic Endo-Trainer) study: a randomized controlled trial of home- versus hospital-based surgical training

Christoph Kuemmerli  1 , Katja Linke  1 , Diana Daume  2 , Nicolas Germann  3 , Ralph Peterli  1 , Beat Müller-Stich  1 , Jennifer M Klasen  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The PLET (Portable Laparoscopic Endo-Trainer) study: a randomized controlled trial of home- versus hospital-based surgical training

Christoph Kuemmerli et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of training with a personal, portable laparoscopic endo-trainer (PLET) on residents' laparoscopic skills.

Methods: The study took place at a tertiary-care academic university hospital in Switzerland. All participants were randomized to either a home- or hospital-based PLET training group, and surgical skill performance was assessed using five laparoscopic exercises. 24 surgical residents, 13 females and 11 males, were enrolled at any training stage. Nine residents completed the assessments. Endpoints consisted of subjective and objective assessment ratings as well as exercise time and qualitative data up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in exercise time and secondary outcomes included performance scores as well as qualitative data.

Results: The hospital-based training group performed exercises number 1, 3 and 4 faster at 12 weeks than at baseline (p = .003, < 0.001 and 0.024). Surgical skill performance was not statistically significantly different in any of the endpoints between the hospital- and home-based training groups at 12 weeks. Both the subjective and objective assessment ratings significantly improved in the hospital-based training group between baseline and 12 weeks (p = .006 and 0.003, respectively). There was no statistically significant improvement in exercise time as well as subjective and objective assessment ratings over time in the home-based training group. The qualitative data suggested that participants who were randomized to the hospital-based training group wished to have the PLET at home and vice versa. Several participants across groups lacked motivation because of their workload or time constraints, though most believed the COVID-19 pandemic had no influence on their motivation or the time they had for training.

Conclusion: The PLET enhances laparoscopic surgical skills over time in a hospital-based training setting. In order to understand and optimize motivational factors, further research is needed.

Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06301230).

Keywords: Education during residency; General surgery; Laparoscopic skills; Laparoscopy trainer; Surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participant recruitment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of time and assessment rating over time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of exercise time for each of the five exercises (A-E) and the assessment rating (F-G)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Keller DS, Delaney CP, Hashemi L, Haas EM. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;30(10):4220–4228. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakmi H, Amodu L, Petrone P, Islam S, Sohail AH, Bourgoin M, Sonoda T, Brathwaite CEM (2022) Apr-Jun;26(2):e2021.00092 Improved Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost with Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Compared to Open Surgery. JSLS. 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00092 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272–283. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00339-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romero P, Günther P, Kowalewski KF, Friedrich M, Schmidt MW, Trent SM, De La Garza JR, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2018 Mar-Apr) Halsted’s See One, Do One, and Teach One versus Peyton’s Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying. J Surg Educ 75(2):510–515. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.025 - PubMed
    1. Akhtar KS, Chen A, Standfield NJ, Gupte CM. The role of simulation in developing surgical skills. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):155–160. doi: 10.1007/s12178-014-9209-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources