Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0300344.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300344. eCollection 2024.

Evaluating digital literacy of health professionals in Ethiopian health sectors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Evaluating digital literacy of health professionals in Ethiopian health sectors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alex Ayenew Chereka et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Digital literacy refers to the capacity to critically assess digital content, use digital tools in professional settings, and operate digital devices with proficiency. The healthcare sector has rapidly digitized in the last few decades. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the digital literacy level of health professionals in the Ethiopian health sector and identify associated factors. The study reviewed relevant literature and analyzed the data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of digital literacy among health professionals in Ethiopia.

Methods: The study was examined by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Evidence was gathered from the databases of Google Scholar, Pub Med, Cochrane Library, Hinari, CINAHL, and Global Health. Consequently, five articles met the eligible criteria for inclusion. The analysis was carried out using STATA version 11. The heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 test, while the funnel plot and Egger's regression test statistic were used to examine for potential publication bias. The pooled effect size of each trial is evaluated using a random effect model meta-analysis, which provides a 95% confidence interval.

Result: A total of five articles were included in this meta-analysis and the overall pooled prevalence of this study was 49.85% (95% CI: 37.22-62.47). six variables, Monthly incomes AOR = 3.89 (95% CI: 1.03-14.66), computer literacy 2.93 (95% CI: 1.27-6.74), perceived usefulness 1.68 (95% CI: 1.59-4.52), educational status 2.56 (95% CI: 1.59-4.13), attitude 2.23 (95% CI: 1.49-3.35), perceived ease of use 2.22 (95% CI: 1.52-3.23) were significantly associated with the outcome variable.

Conclusion: The findings of the study revealed that the overall digital literacy level among health professionals in Ethiopia was relatively low. The study highlights the importance of addressing the digital literacy gap among health professionals in Ethiopia. It suggests the need for targeted interventions, such as increasing monthly incomes, giving computer training, creating a positive attitude, and educational initiatives, to enhance digital literacy skills among health professionals. By improving digital literacy, health professionals can effectively utilize digital technologies and contribute to the advancement of healthcare services in Ethiopia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no known competing financial interests or personal ties among the authors that could have influenced the work presented in this study.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flowcharts showing the selection process of the articles.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The pooled prevalence of high digital literacy levels among health professionals in Ethiopia.
2023.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot to shows publication bias among the included articles of high digital literacy level a systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia, 2023.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Factors associated with Ethiopian health professionals’ digital literacy level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. <References>. Bulson J., Van Dyke M., and Skibinski N., Rebooting healthcare information technology downtime management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 2017. 11(1): p. 63–72. - PubMed
    1. Piscotty R.J. Jr, Kalisch B., and Gracey‐Thomas A., Impact of healthcare information technology on nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2015. 47(4): p. 287–293. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piette J.D., et al.., Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low-and middle-income countries: where do we go from here? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2012. 90: p. 365–372. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Der Vaart R. and Drossaert C., Development of the digital health literacy instrument: measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. 19(1): p. e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6709 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inskip C., Developing library staff digital literacies. 2018, Facet.

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.