Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 12;19(1):293.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04789-7.

Factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study based on EOS imaging system

Affiliations

Factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study based on EOS imaging system

Qing Fan et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of bracing on apical vertebral derotation and explore the factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. For patients with AIS, vertebral rotation causes cosmetic appearance abnormalities and acts as an indicator for curve progression. However, there have been few studies investigating the precise derotation effects of bracing for apical vertebra. The application of EOS imaging system enables quantitative evaluation of vertebral rotation in the axial plane in a standing position.

Methods: There were 82 eligible patients enrolled in current study, who underwent EOS imaging evaluation before and immediately after bracing. The clinical demographic data (age, gender, Risser sign and menstrual status) were recorded. The correlation analyses between derotation effects and key parameters (age, pre-brace Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, vertebral rotation, pelvis axial rotation and apical vertebral level) were performed. The in-brace derotation effects stratified by gender, Risser sign, apical vertebral level, menarche status, coronal balance and sagittal balance were also analyzed.

Results: The rotation of apical vertebra was decreased from 8.8 ± 6.0 degrees before bracing to 3.8 ± 3.3 degrees immediately after bracing (p < 0.001), and the derotation rate was 49.2 ± 38.3%. The derotation degrees in brace was significantly correlated with major curve Cobb angle (r = 0.240, p = 0.030), minor curve Cobb angle (r = 0.256, p = 0.020) and total curve Cobb angle (r = 0.266, p = 0.016). Both the pre-brace apical vertebral rotation and apical vertebral level were significantly correlated with derotation effects in brace (p < 0.001). Patients with thoracic major curve showed worse derotation effects than those with lumbar major curve (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with coronal balance showed better in-brace derotation effects than those with coronal decompensation (p = 0.005).

Conclusions: A satisfactory apical vertebral derotation rate (approximately 50%) could be obtained immediately after bracing in AIS patients. Pre-brace Cobb angle of curve, pre-brace apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral level and coronal balance exhibited close associations with in-brace derotation effects of apical vertebra.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Brace treatment; Derotation effects; EOS imaging system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An illustrative case of EOS 3D reconstruction of an AIS patient before and immediately after bracing. A Anteroposterior view; B 3D images from the front; C 3D images from the above; D Enlarged 3D image view of apical vertebra; E Diagrams illustrating vertebral rotation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatterplots and regression line between derotation effects and related parameters. A Scatterplots and regression line between pre-brace rotation of apical vertebra and derotation degrees in brace (r = 0.846, p < 0.001); B Scatterplots and regression line between pre-brace rotation of apical vertebra and derotation rate in brace (r = 0.315, p = 0.004); C Scatterplots and regression line between apical vertebral level and derotation degrees in brace (r = 0.610, p < 0.001); D Scatterplots and regression line between apical vertebral level and derotation rate in brace (r = 0.384, p < 0.001)

Similar articles

References

    1. Shao X, Fu X, Yang J, Sui W, Li S, Yang W, et al. The asymmetrical ESR1 signaling in muscle progenitor cells determines the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cell Discov. 2023;9(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41421-023-00531-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faldini C, Manzetti M, Neri S, Barile F, Viroli G, Geraci G, et al. Epigenetic and genetic factors related to curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic scoping review of the current literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):5914. doi: 10.3390/ijms23115914. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Blasi PR, Nguyen M, Lin JS. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2018;319(2):173–187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1512–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwan KYH, Cheung AKP, Koh HY, Cheung KMC. Brace effectiveness is related to 3-dimensional plane parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2021;103(1):37–43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00267. - DOI - PubMed