Data-Driven Surveillance Protocol for Patients at Risk for Peritoneal Recurrence of Primary Colon Cancer: Surveillance for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- PMID: 38673629
- PMCID: PMC11051491
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082358
Data-Driven Surveillance Protocol for Patients at Risk for Peritoneal Recurrence of Primary Colon Cancer: Surveillance for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is rarely discovered early due to low sensitivity of screening imaging and tumor markers, however, earlier identification may improve outcomes. This study assesses risk factors and time to recurrence of PC and implementation of a surveillance system. Patients with stage II-III colon adenocarcinoma undergoing curative colectomy between 2005-2022 were retrospectively reviewed at a single tertiary care institution. Patients were divided into three cohorts: no recurrence (NR), PC, and other types of recurrence (OTR). Baseline characteristics between cohorts were compared with univariate analysis. Overall survival and PC risk were assessed using multivariate analysis with Cox's proportional-hazard modelling. 412 patients were included; 78.4% had NR, 7.8% had PC, and 13.8% had OTR. Patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor side, and histologic features were similar between cohorts. Patients with PC were more likely to have microscopic tumor perforation (25% vs. 8.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.002), margin involvement (25% vs. 8.8% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (56.2% vs. 33.3%, vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001), perineural invasion (28.1% vs. 15.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.026) compared to OTR or NR. Median time to PC after colectomy was 11 months. Tumor characteristics of stage II-III colon cancer define a high-risk profile for PC. An early surveillance program sensitive for peritoneal disease should be adopted for these patients.
Keywords: carcinomatosis; colorectal neoplasms; peritoneal neoplasms; recurrence.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Impact of pT Stage and Peritoneal Invasion in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jun;62(6):684-693. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001367. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 30839315
-
Systematic Second-look Surgery Plus HIPEC in Patients Without Evidence of Recurrence, at High Risk of Carcinomatosis After Colorectal Cancer Resection.Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;96(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.11.006. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018. PMID: 29397879 English, Spanish.
-
Can a morphological description of the peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer add prognostic information? Analysis of 1686 patients of the tumor bank ovarian cancer.Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 21;12:1014073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1014073. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36620574 Free PMC article.
-
Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: HIPEC?Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.026. Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 18257149 Review.
-
Definition of patients presenting a high risk of developing peritoneal carcinomatosis after curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):183-92. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2473-5. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23090572 Review.
References
-
- Kerscher A.G., Chua T.C., Gasser M., Maeder U., Kunzmann V., Isbert C., Germer C.T., Pelz J.O.W. Impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis in the disease history of colorectal cancer management: A longitudinal experience of 2406 patients over two decades. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;108:1432–1439. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.82. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Elias D., Honoré C., Dumont F., Ducreux M., Boige V., Malka D., Burtin P., Dromain C., Goéré D. Results of systematic second-look surgery plus HIPEC in asymptomatic patients presenting a high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann. Surg. 2011;254:289–293. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822638f6. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources