Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 13;11(3):343.
doi: 10.3390/children11030343.

Clinician- and Patient-Centred Outcomes of Digital Impressions in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review

Jyotsna Unnikrishnan  1 , Yasaman Etemad Shahidi  1 , Mahmoud Bakr  1 , Robert Love  1 , Ghassan Idris  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Clinician- and Patient-Centred Outcomes of Digital Impressions in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review

Jyotsna Unnikrishnan et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

This systematic review examines the effectiveness of digital impressions in infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP), focusing on accuracy, operator preferences, and parents' perceptions. The PICO-formulated focused questions assessed the accuracy and operator preference of digital impressions compared to conventional impressions in infants with cleft lip and palate, while also exploring parents' perceptions as patient-centred outcomes. Electronic and manual searches were conducted in five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library; to acquire grey literature, Google Scholar was also consulted. Both experimental and observational studies that used digital impressions in the clinical care of infants with CLP were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Out of 503 records, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The accuracy assessment included surface discrepancy and intra-arch measurements. Surface discrepancy studies showed variations in the premaxillary segments, while intra-arch measurements revealed no significant differences. Operators preferred digital impressions, citing reduced stress and streamlined workflows. Parents expressed a clear preference for digital over conventional impressions. The conclusions drawn were substantiated by weak evidence due to the limited number and the high risk of bias of the included studies. Challenges remain here, warranting continued research to enhance accuracy and assess parents' preferences, ensuring optimal outcomes for infants with CLP.

Keywords: cleft lip; cleft palate; clinicians; digital dental impression technique; infant; parents; perception; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanaka S.A., Mahabir R.C., Jupiter D.C., Menezes J.M. Updating the epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012;129:511e–518e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402dd1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization WHO Human Genetics Programme, WHO Meeting on International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies (1st: 2000: Geneva, Switzerland, 5–8 November 2000); WHO Meeting on International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies (2nd: 2001: Park City, UT, USA, 24–26 May 2001). Global strategies to reduce the health-care burden of craniofacial anomalies: Report of WHO Meetings on International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2004;41:238–243. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson B.N., Rosenstein S.W. Early maxillary orthopedics for the newborn cleft lip and palate patient. An impression and an appliance. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:247–263. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1984)054<0247:EMOFTN>2.0.CO;2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chate R.A. A report on the hazards encountered when taking neonatal cleft palate impressions (1983–1992) Br. J. Orthod. 1995;22:299–307. doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.4.299. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grayson B.H. Nasoalveolar Molding for Infants Born with Clefts of the Lip, Alveolus, and Palate. Semin. Plast. Surg. 2005;19:294–301. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-925902. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources