Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 12;24(12):4339-4348.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4339.

Comparative Analysis of Mortality due to Breast Cancer and Mammography Uptake in the Federative Units of Brazil-2015 to 2021

Affiliations

Comparative Analysis of Mortality due to Breast Cancer and Mammography Uptake in the Federative Units of Brazil-2015 to 2021

Lander Dos Santos et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Objective: Compare the breast cancer mortality rate and the rate of mammograms with socioeconomic factors, in Brazilian´s Federative Units, during the period of 2015 to 2021. Methods: This is an ecological study, of a descriptive nature, which covers the 27 Brazilian federative units, using secondary data extracted from the DATASUS System. The information analyzed was mammography data, breast cancer mortality, demographic and economic data of the resident population and women over 20 years of age. Results: There is a direct relationship between mortality rate and mammograms rates in the Federative Units. The data obtained for Brazil presents a total of 133,048 deaths from breast cancer and 17,324,526 mammography exams in the period from 2015 to 2021. In other words, Brazil presents a standardized mortality rate value, 19.25 deaths per 100,000 women. Regarding the mammography rate, the value of the exam-specific mammography rate was 2,506.55 per 100,000 women. In relation to socioeconomic data by mortality rate group, higher mortality rates from breast cancer present higher rates in the variables: income rate by State (2,594.86), people with income (63.5), average percentage of women with more over 50 years old (29.5%), women with average years of education (6.64), white population (55.1%) and mammography exam rate (2873.20). When analysing the highest rates of mammography exam rates, higher rates are observed income rate by State (2,161.47), people with income (62.5%), average percentage of women over 50 years old (28.6%), women with an average number of years of education (5.8). Conclusion: Brazil has a high mortality rate due to breast cancer, when compared to other countries. The reasons are diverse, such as the modern, industrialized and populous lifestyle. The Federative Units with the highest mortality rate also have high rates of mammograms, that is, in the Federative Units with "better" sociodemographic conditions, the South and Southeast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of CMR and Ratio of Mammograms by Federation Unit from 2015 to 2021 (Acre-AC, Alagoas-AL, Amapá-AP, Amazonas-AM, Bahia-BA, Ceará-CE, Distrito Federal-DF, Goiás-GO, Maranhão-MA, Mato Grosso-MT, Mato Grosso do Sul-MS, Pará-PA, Pernambuco-PE, Piauí-PI, Rio Grande do Norte-RN, Rondônia-RO, Roraima-RR, Sergipe-SE, Tocantins-TO, Espírito Santo-ES, Minas Gerais-MG, Paraíba-PB, Paraná-PR, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Rio Grande do Sul-RS, Santa Catarina-SC e São Paulo-SP)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mapping of rates by Federative Unit. (a) Description of Standardized Mortality Rate by Federative Unit; (b) Description of Mammography Exam Rate by Federative Unit (Acre-AC, Alagoas-AL, Amapá-AP, Amazonas-AM, Bahia-BA, Ceará-CE, Distrito Federal-DF, Goiás-GO, Maranhão-MA, Mato Grosso-MT, Mato Grosso do Sul-MS, Pará-PA, Pernambuco-PE, Piauí-PI, Rio Grande do Norte-RN, Rondônia-RO, Roraima-RR, Sergipe-SE, Tocantins-TO, Espírito Santo-ES, Minas Gerais-MG, Paraíba-PB, Paraná-PR, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Rio Grande do Sul-RS, Santa Catarina-SC e São Paul-SP)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anastasiadi Z, Lianos GD, Ignatiadou E, Harissis HV, Mitsis M. Breast cancer in young women: an overview. Updates Surg. 2017;69:313–7. - PubMed
    1. Barbosa IR, Costa ICC, Bernal MM, Souza DLB. As iniquidades sociais e as disparidades na mortalidade por câncer relativo ao gênero. Rev Ciência Plural. 2015;1:79–86.
    1. Barbosa IR, Costa ICC, Bernal MM, Souza DLB. Desigualdades socioeconômicas e mortalidade por câncer: um estudo ecológico no Brasil. Rev Bras promoç Saúde. 2016;29:350–6.
    1. Cavalcante JAG, Batista LM, Assis TS. Câncer de mama: perfil epidemiológico e clínico em um hospital de referência na paraíba. SANARE. 2021;20:17–24.