Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 29:14:1307839.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1307839. eCollection 2024.

Targeting the DNA damage response in hematological malignancies

Affiliations
Review

Targeting the DNA damage response in hematological malignancies

Sanjay De Mel et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Deregulation of the DNA damage response (DDR) plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of many cancers. The dependency of certain cancers on DDR pathways has enabled exploitation of such through synthetically lethal relationships e.g., Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for BRCA deficient ovarian cancers. Though lagging behind that of solid cancers, DDR inhibitors (DDRi) are being clinically developed for haematological cancers. Furthermore, a high proliferative index characterize many such cancers, suggesting a rationale for combinatorial strategies targeting DDR and replicative stress. In this review, we summarize pre-clinical and clinical data on DDR inhibition in haematological malignancies and highlight distinct haematological cancer subtypes with activity of DDR agents as single agents or in combination with chemotherapeutics and targeted agents. We aim to provide a framework to guide the design of future clinical trials involving haematological cancers for this important class of drugs.

Keywords: DNA damage; clinical trials; combination therapy; haematologic malignancies; inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AJ has received consultancy fees from Roche, Gilead, Turbine Ltd, AstraZeneca, Antegene, Janssen, MSD and IQVIA; and research funding from Janssen and AstraZeneca. SD has been on advisory boards for Amgen and Pfizer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic summarizing the DDR is tested pre-clinically across all haematological malignancies. Created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

References

    1. O'Connor MJ. Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Mol Cell (2015) 60(4):547–60. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell (2011) 144(5):646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell (2007) 28(5):739–45. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearl LH, Schierz AC, Ward SE, Al-Lazikani B, Pearl FMG. Therapeutic opportunities within the DNA damage response. Nat Rev Cancer (2015) 15(3):166–80. doi: 10.1038/nrc3891 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pilié PG, Tang C, Mills GB, Yap TA. State-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2019) 16(2):81–104. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0114-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Work in AJ’s laboratory is funded by a core grant from the Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore through the National Research Foundation Singapore and the Singapore Ministry of Education under its Research Centres of Excellence initiative.

LinkOut - more resources