Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 15;13(1):80.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010080.

Extracellular Vesicles from a Biofilm of a Clinical Isolate of Candida albicans Negatively Impact on Klebsiella pneumoniae Adherence and Biofilm Formation

Marianna Imparato  1 , Angela Maione  1 , Annalisa Buonanno  1 , Renato Gesuele  1 , Noemi Gallucci  2 , Maria Michela Corsaro  2 , Luigi Paduano  2 , Angela Casillo  2 , Marco Guida  1   3   4 , Emilia Galdiero  1   4 , Elisabetta de Alteriis  1
Affiliations

Extracellular Vesicles from a Biofilm of a Clinical Isolate of Candida albicans Negatively Impact on Klebsiella pneumoniae Adherence and Biofilm Formation

Marianna Imparato et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

The opportunistic human fungal pathogen Candida albicans produces and releases into the surrounding medium extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are involved in some processes as communication between fungal cells and host-pathogen interactions during infection. Here, we have conducted the isolation of EVs produced by a clinical isolate of C. albicans during biofilm formation and proved their effect towards the ability of the Gram-negative bacterial pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae to adhere to HaCaT cells and form a biofilm in vitro. The results represent the first evidence of an antagonistic action of fungal EVs against bacteria.

Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; biofilm; candidiasis; extracellular vesicles; pathogenic fungi.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) SEM visualization of C. albicans biofilm showing EVs on the surface. The arrow indicates a residue of extracellular matrix of the biofilm. Bar corresponds to 1 mm. (B) TEM photograph of an isolated extracellular vesicle from C. albicans biofilm. Bar corresponds to 200 nm. (C) Hydrodynamic radius distribution of an EVs suspension in PBS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
GC-MS chromatogram of FAMEs from C. albicans EVs. Peaks marked with an asterisk are contaminants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fungal EVs (1.25; 2.5; 3.75; 6.25 µg mL−1, based on protein content) attenuate K. pneumoniae biofilm formation at different times of exposition (3, 6 and 24 h). Data were normalized to control and the results are expressed as percentage of inhibition compared to control (*** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, Tukey’s test); Each experiment was replicated three times and error bar represent SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell viability of HaCaT cells upon exposure to different concentrations of EVs (1.25; 2.5; 3.75; 6.25 µg mL−1). The percentages of cell viability for each of the treatments were calculated in comparison to the control. Each experiment was replicated three times and error bar represent SD.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Assessment of anti-adhesion attributes of EVs used at the same concentrations of cytotoxicity assay (1.25; 2.5; 3.75; 6.25 µg mL−1). Treatment of HaCaT cells with K. pneumoniae only was used as positive control. Data are average of three experiments analyzed in triplicate and error bar represent SD (** = p < 0.01, **** = p < 0.0001, Tukey’s test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan–Meier plots of survival curves of G. mellonella larvae infected with K. pneumoniae (1 × 103 CFU/larva) alone or in the presence of EVs (6.25 µg per larva based on protein content). Survival curves of intact larvae (control) and larvae injected with PBS are also reported. ** Represents significant difference vs. larvae injected with K. pneumoniae (p < 0.001 Log-rank Mantel-Cox test).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deatherage B.L., Cookson B.T. Membrane vesicle release in bacteria, eukaryotes, and archaea: A conserved yet underappreciated aspect of microbial life. Infect. Immun. 2012;80:1948–1957. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06014-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gill S., Catchpole R., Forterre P. Extracellular membrane vesicles in the three domains of life and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019;43:273–303. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathieu M., Martin-Jaular L., Lavieu G., Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:9–17. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Souza W., Barrias E.S. Membrane-bound extracellular vesicles secreted by parasitic protozoa: Cellular structures involved in the communication between cells. Parasitol. Res. 2020;119:2005–2023. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06691-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizzo J., Taheraly A., Janbon G. Structure, composition and biological properties of fungal extracellular vesicles. microLife. 2021;2:uqab009. doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqab009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources