Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 22;12(1):30.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010030.

Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Anh B Lam  1 , Vanessa Moore  2 , Ryan D Nipp  3
Affiliations
Review

Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Anh B Lam et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal malignancies represent a particularly challenging condition, often requiring a multidisciplinary approach to management in order to meet the unique needs of these individuals and their caregivers.

Purpose: In this literature review, we sought to describe care delivery interventions that strive to improve the quality of life and care for patients with a focus on gastrointestinal malignancies.

Conclusion: We highlight patient-centered care delivery interventions, including patient-reported outcomes, hospital-at-home interventions, and other models of care for individuals with cancer. By demonstrating the relevance and utility of these different care models for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, we hope to highlight the importance of developing and testing new interventions to address the unique needs of this population.

Keywords: collaborative care; financial toxicity; gastrointestinal cancer; geriatric oncology; hospital-at-home; palliative oncology; patient-reported outcomes; supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancer outcomes research care delivery models.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Repici A., Badalamenti M., Maselli R., Correale L., Radaelli F., Rondonotti E., Ferrara E., Spadaccini M., Alkandari A., Fugazza A., et al. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:512–520.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basch E., Deal A.M., Kris M.G., Scher H.I., Hudis C.A., Sabbatini P., Rogak L., Bennett A.V., Dueck A.C., Atkinson T.M., et al. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:557–565. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nipp R.D., Shulman E., Smith M., Brown P.M.C., Johnson P.C., Gaufberg E., Vyas C., Qian C.L., Neckermann I., Hornstein S.B., et al. Supportive oncology care at home interventions: Protocols for clinical trials to shift the paradigm of care for patients with cancer. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:383. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09461-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendren S., Griggs J.J., Epstein R., Humiston S., Jean-Pierre P., Winters P., Sanders M., Loader S., Fiscella K. Randomized controlled trial of patient navigation for newly diagnosed cancer patients: Effects on quality of life. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2012;21:1682–1690. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0537. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohile S.G., Mohamed M.R., Xu H., Culakova E., Loh K.P., Magnuson A., Flannery M.A., Obrecht S., Gilmore N., Ramsdale E., et al. Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): A cluster-randomised study. Lancet. 2021;398:1894–1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01789-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources