Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review
- PMID: 38146053
- PMCID: PMC11222887
- DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0407
Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review
Abstract
This review comprehensively examines the evolution and current state of interbody cage technology for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). This review highlights the biomechanical and clinical implications of the transition from traditional static cage designs to advanced expandable variants for spinal surgery. The review begins by exploring the early developments in cage materials, highlighting the roles of titanium and polyetheretherketone in the advancement of LIF techniques. This review also discusses the strengths and limitations of these materials, leading to innovations in surface modifications and the introduction of novel materials, such as tantalum, as alternative materials. Advancements in three-dimensional printing and surface modification technologies form a significant part of this review, emphasizing the role of these technologies in enhancing the biomechanical compatibility and osseointegration of interbody cages. In addition, this review explores the increase in biodegradable and composite materials such as polylactic acid and polycaprolactone, addressing their potential to mitigate long-term implant-related complications. A critical evaluation of static and expandable cages is presented, including their respective clinical and radiological outcomes. While static cages have been a mainstay of LIF, expandable cages are noted for their adaptability to the patient's anatomy, reducing complications such as cage subsidence. However, this review highlights the ongoing debate and the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the superiority of either cage type in terms of clinical outcomes. Finally, this review proposes future directions for cage technology, focusing on the integration of bioactive substances and multifunctional coatings and the development of patient-specific implants. These advancements aim to further enhance the efficacy, safety, and personalized approach of spinal fusion surgeries. Moreover, this review offers a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of cage technology in LIF and provides insights into current practices and future possibilities in spinal surgery.
Keywords: 3D printing; Biodegradable cage; Expandable cage; Lumbar interbody fusion; Surface modification.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biodegradable interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: Current concepts and future directions.Biomaterials. 2022 Sep;288:121699. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121699. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Biomaterials. 2022. PMID: 35995620 Review.
-
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable vs Static Titanium Interbody Cages: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):265-275. doi: 10.14444/8422. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 36889901 Free PMC article.
-
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29496624 Free PMC article.
-
Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 2: Feasibility Assessment of an Endplate Conforming Bidirectional Expandable Interbody Cage.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S68-S74. doi: 10.14444/7129. Epub 2020 Oct 29. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 33122178 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35399075 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Expandable Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2024 May 14;13(10):2889. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102889. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38792431 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of the Disc Vacuum Phenomenon on Surgical Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Study between Endoscopic Decompression and Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 29;13(19):5827. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195827. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39407888 Free PMC article.
-
Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 30;14(8):809. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080809. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39202002 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship of the Iliac Crest Height with Subsidence After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4-5: A Quantitative and Categorical Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 18;13(20):6223. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206223. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39458172 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Cage Material and Size on Fusion Rate and Subsidence Following Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):973-983. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448244.122. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Neurospine. 2024. PMID: 39363473 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hee HT, Castro FP, Jr, Majd ME, Holt RT, Myers L. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14:533–40. - PubMed
-
- Laubach M, Kobbe P, Hutmacher DW. Biodegradable interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: current concepts and future directions. Biomaterials. 2022;288:121699. - PubMed
-
- Dhall SS, Choudhri TF, Eck JC, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5: correlation between radiographic outcome and function. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:31–6. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources