Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Apr;271(4):1599-1609.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12135-w. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Baseline serum neurofilament light chain levels differentiate aggressive from benign forms of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 20-year follow-up cohort

Affiliations
Observational Study

Baseline serum neurofilament light chain levels differentiate aggressive from benign forms of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 20-year follow-up cohort

Pablo Arroyo Pereiro et al. J Neurol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Serum biomarkers are emerging as useful prognostic tools for multiple sclerosis (MS); however, long-term studies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of the serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL), total tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and chitinase 3-like-1 (CHI3L1) measured close to the time of MS onset.

Methods: In this retrospective, exploratory, observational, case and controls study, patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with available baseline serum samples and prospectively follow-up in our MS unit for a long time were selected based on their clinical evolution to form two groups: (1) a benign RRMS (bRRMS) group, defined as patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≤ 3 at ≥ 10 years of follow-up; (2) an aggressive RRMS (aRRMS) group, defined as patients with an EDSS score of ≥ 6 at ≤ 15 years of follow-up. An age-matched healthy control (HC) group was selected. NfL, total tau, and GFAP serum levels were quantified using a single-molecule array (SIMOA), and CHI3L1 was quantified using ELISA.

Results: Thirty-one patients with bRRMS, 19 with aRRMS, and 10 HC were included. The median follow-up time from sample collection was 17.74 years (interquartile range, 14.60-20.37). Bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed significantly higher NfL and GFAP levels in the aRRMS group than in the bRRMS group. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified serum NfL level as the most efficient marker for distinguishing aRRMS from bRRMS.

Discussion: This proof-of-concept study comparing benign and aggressive RRMS groups reinforces the potential role of baseline NfL serum levels as a promising long-term disability prognostic marker. In contrast, serum GFAP, total tau, and CHI3L1 levels demonstrated a lower or no ability to differentiate between the long-term outcomes of RRMS.

Keywords: Biomarkers; CHI3L1; GFAP; Multiple sclerosis; Prognosis; sNfL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Pablo Arroyo-Pereiro, Albert Muñoz-Vendrell, Isabel León, Antonio Martínez-Yélamos and Sergio Martínez-Yélamos received honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for collaborations as consultants and scientific communications; they also received research support as well as funding for travel and congress expenses from Roche, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall, and Celgene. Pol Andrés-Benito received research support funding from Biogen Iberica S.L.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution boxplots of NfL (A), GFAP (B), CHI3L1 (C), and total Tau (D) levels in the serum of benign and aggressive forms of RRMS patients and control cases using single molecule array (SIMOA) and ELISA technologies. A case scatter plot is represented by dots and outliers by triangles. A logarithmic scale for NFL levels was used in A to improve data visualization. Statistical signification (corrected for multiple comparisons in Dunn test) among groups were set at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of NfL, GFAP, CHI3L1 and total Tau serum quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign RRMS and aggressive RRMS. AUC values, corresponding to the area under ROC curves

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):169–180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1401483. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weideman AM, Tapia-Maltos MA, Johnson K, Greenwood M, Bielekova B. Meta-analysis of the age-dependent efficacy of multiple sclerosis treatments. Front Neurol. 2017 doi: 10.3389/FNEUR.2017.00577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ontaneda D, Tallantyre E, Kalincik T, Planchon SM, Evangelou N. Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:973–980. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30151-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harding K, et al. Clinical outcomes of escalation vs early intensive disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):536–541. doi: 10.1001/JAMANEUROL.2018.4905. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul A, Comabella M, Gandhi R. Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019 doi: 10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A029058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types