An Analysis of pre and post-Processing Semen Parameters at The Time of Intrauterine Insemination; and The Confounding Effects of Total Motile Sperm Counts on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 38041455
- PMCID: PMC10692746
- DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.560766.1355
An Analysis of pre and post-Processing Semen Parameters at The Time of Intrauterine Insemination; and The Confounding Effects of Total Motile Sperm Counts on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: This study aims to determine whether pre or post-processing semen parameters obtained during intrauterine insemination (IUI) predict pregnancy when controlling for confounding effects.
Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study of 2231 semen analyses was conducted at McGill University of IVF center. Any couples who underwent IUI with partner sperm, over a 2.5-year period, were included. Controlled ovarian stimulation was done with Clomiphene Citrate, Letrozole, or Gonadotropins. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests, two types of stepwise logistic regression, and stepwise discriminant analysis. A comparison of pre and post-processing semen parameters was undertaken to determine the probability of pregnancy.
Results: There were significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women in post-processing concentration (P=0.043), post-processing total motile sperm count (TMSC) (P=0.049), and post-linearity (P=0.012). However, when variable out-of-the-equation logistic regression or discriminant analysis, which controls for confounding effects between variables, were used, the findings were no longer significant. It was statistically proven that when a variable in the equation logistic regression was employed, post-processing concentration (P=0.005) and post-processing TMSC (P=0.009) remained reliable predictors of pregnancy.
Conclusion: Two of three prediction models suggested that TMSC's relationship with pregnancy is due to confounding factors. One model maintained the validity of the TMSC. While TMSC has always been studied as an important predictor of insemination pregnancies, this finding may be due to confounding effects between semen parameters and therefore requires further investigation as to this relationship.
Keywords: Artificial Insemination; Pregnancy; Semen Analysis.
Similar articles
-
The Use of Pooled Consecutive Ejaculates in Moderate Male Factor Infertility to Increase Intrauterine Insemination Success.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):149-155. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_27_21. Epub 2021 Jun 28. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021. PMID: 34316230 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of pregnancy rates in pre-treatment male infertility and low total motile sperm count at insemination.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):211-217. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3850-7. Epub 2015 Aug 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26288981
-
Is controlled ovarian stimulation and insemination an effective treatment in older women with male partners with decreased total motile sperm counts?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):261-266. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06091-x. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 34223975
-
The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 20. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 24965998 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Nov 15. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014. PMID: 24456701 Review.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infertility FAQs. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/ infertility/index.htm#:~:text=In.... (1 May 2023).
-
- Salmon-Divon M, Shrem G, Balayla J, Nehushtan T, Volodarsky- Perel A, Steiner N, et al. An age-based sperm nomogram: the McGill reference guide. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(10):2213–2225. - PubMed
-
- Hamilton JA, Cissen M, Brandes M, Smeenk JM, de Bruin JP, Kremer JA, et al. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1110–1121. - PubMed
-
- Madbouly K, Isa A, Habous M, Almannie R, Abu-Rafea B, Binsaleh S. Postwash total motile sperm count: should it be included as a standard male infertility work up. Can J Urol. 2017;24(3):8847–8852. - PubMed
-
- Lin H, Li Y, Ou S, Jiao X, Wang W, Haahr T, et al. The relationship of total progressive motile sperm count with the outcome of IUI?. An analysis of 5171 cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38(11):954–959. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources