Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 4;10(10):604.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci10100604.

Nutritional Strategies to Promote Bovine Oocyte Quality for In Vitro Embryo Production: Do They Really Work?

Affiliations
Review

Nutritional Strategies to Promote Bovine Oocyte Quality for In Vitro Embryo Production: Do They Really Work?

Miguel A Velazquez. Vet Sci. .

Abstract

The ability of bovine oocytes to reach the blastocyst stage (i.e., embryo with around 150 cells in cattle) in vitro can be affected by technical (e.g., culture medium used) and physiological factors in oocyte donors (e.g., age, breed). As such, the nutritional status of oocyte donors plays a significant role in the efficiency of in vitro embryo production (IVEP), and several nutritional strategies have been investigated in cattle subjected to ovum pick-up (OPU). However, there is no clear consensus on the reliability of nutritional schemes to improve IVEP in cattle. Available evidence suggests that a moderate body condition score (i.e., 3 in a 1-5 scale) in cattle is compatible with a metabolic microenvironment in ovarian follicles that will promote embryo formation in vitro. The usefulness of fatty acid and micronutrient supplementation to improve IVEP in cattle is debatable with the current information available. Overall, the supply of maintenance nutritional requirements according to developmental and productive stage seems to be enough to provide bovine oocyte donors with a good chance of producing embryos in vitro. Future nutrition research in cattle using OPU-IVEP models needs to consider animal well-being aspects (i.e., stress caused by handling and sampling), which could affect the results.

Keywords: cattle; in vitro culture; nutrition; oocyte competence; preimplantation embryo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main steps in standard in vitro production of embryos for commercial purposes in cattle. Oocytes are usually collected via ovum pick-up (OPU) on live animals. In vitro maturation (IVM) can be done in portable incubators sent overnight to the laboratory. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) and in vitro embryo culture (IVEC) are performed at the laboratory. Components are not drawn to scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gerland P., Raftery A.E., Ševčíková H., Li N., Gu D., Spoorenberg T., Alkema L., Fosdick B.K., Chunn J., Lalic N., et al. World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science. 2014;346:234–237. doi: 10.1126/science.1257469. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Springmann M., Mason-D’Croz D., Robinson S., Garnett T., Godfray H.C.J., Gollin D., Rayner M., Ballon P., Scarborough P. Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: A modelling study. Lancet. 2016;387:1937–1946. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reynolds L.P., Wulster-Radcliffe M.C., Aaron D.K., Davis T.A. Importance of Animals in Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security. J. Nutr. 2015;145:1377–1379. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.212217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis T.C., White R.R. Breeding animals to feed people: The many roles of animal reproduction in ensuring global food security. Theriogenology. 2020;150:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlen C., Larson J., Lamb G.C. Impacts of reproductive technologies on beef production in the United States. In: Lamb G., DiLorenzo N., editors. Current and Future Reproductive Technologies and World Food Production. Volume 752. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2014. pp. 97–114. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.