Association of Patient Satisfaction with Cataract Grading in Five Types of Multifocal IOLs
- PMID: 37884810
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02698-5
Association of Patient Satisfaction with Cataract Grading in Five Types of Multifocal IOLs
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Association of Patient Satisfaction with Cataract Grading in Five Types of Multifocal IOLs.Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1774. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02804-1. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 38430403 No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated patient satisfaction levels in five premium intraocular lenses (IOLs). A secondary aim was to determine whether patient satisfaction was associated with the cataract grade before lens surgery.
Methods: In this multicenter prospective comparative study, 164 patients from diverse backgrounds underwent cataract surgery and were assigned for identical bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs. In addition to visual performance, quality of life was measured using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality Of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL 42) scoring questionnaire. The Sirius Scheimpflug Analyzer was used to evaluate the posterior cornea and aberrations. Finally, the association of patient satisfaction reports with the Pentacam Cataract Grading Scale (PCGS) and Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS III) was evaluated.
Results: A considerable subjective improvement was observed in uncorrected far, near (40 cm), and intermediate (60 cm) visual acuity in the five groups (P values < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity between Symfony, Trinova, and AT LISA at the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree, favoring Symfony (P < 0.001). PanOptix users had considerably lower mean coma values (P < 0.001), while AT LISA users had lower mean spherical aberrations (P = 0.009) compared to the other groups. No additional safety concerns relating to IOLs were recorded. Mean satisfaction had a high correlation with LOCS and Pentacam Nuclear Staging (PNS) in each lens group, e.g., correlation coefficient and P value for AT LISA were respectively r = 0.99, P < 0.001 and r = 0.97, P = 0.004.
Conclusion: Despite discrepancies between groups of lenses, most patients who received multifocal IOLs reported satisfaction at more than 3 years after the initial operation. A growing number of patients with cataracts are seeking spectacle-free vision with presbyopia-correcting IOLs. Hence, the high satisfaction rate among patients with cataract could indicate the value of offering a wider range of available lenses.
Keywords: Aberrometry; Cataract; Contrast sensitivity; Intraocular; Lens crystalline; Lens implantation; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Visual acuity.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Visual Outcomes After Cataract Surgery: Multifocal Versus Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.J Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;31(10):658-66. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150611-01. J Refract Surg. 2015. PMID: 26465253 Clinical Trial.
-
Visual results and subjective satisfaction after implantation of two different trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses models (AcrySof IQ PanOptix and AT LISA tri 839 MP).Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024 May;34(3):726-733. doi: 10.1177/11206721231201561. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 37770020
-
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29980919
-
Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 1;2014(5):CD009667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009667.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24788900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12(12):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27943250 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Results of a Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Using the Holladay Total Surgically Induced Astigmatism Formula for Correcting Low Corneal Astigmatism in Japanese Patients.Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 8;18:755-763. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S448427. eCollection 2024. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38476355 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of the Visual, Refractive and Aberrometric Outcome with the Use of 2 Intraocular Refractive Segment Multifocal Lenses.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):239. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010239. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202246 Free PMC article.
-
A New Methodology for Evaluating the Potential Impact of Residual Refractive Astigmatism in Pseudophakic Patients.Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;18:1909-1914. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S453340. eCollection 2024. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39055380 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amigo-Frances A, Castillo-Gomez A, Carmona-Gonzalez D, Martinez-Sorribes P, Amigó A. Comparative study of visual results obtained with two trifocal lens models in cataract surgery. J Clin Res Ophthalmol. 2020;7:054–60.
-
- Ucar F, Cetinkaya S. The evaluation of postoperative objective and subjective refraction for premium intraocular lenses. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2020;79:386–90.
-
- Wang X, Tu H, Wang Y. Comparative analysis of visual performance and optical quality with a rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens and an apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1–8.
-
- Nuzzi R, Tripoli F, Ghilardi A. Evaluation of the effects of multifocal intraocular lens oculentis LENTIS Mplus LS-313 MF30 on visual performance in patients affected by bilateral cataract and treated with phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmol. 2022;2022:1–10. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical