Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 6;24(19):14956.
doi: 10.3390/ijms241914956.

New Facets of DNA Double Strand Break Repair: Radiation Dose as Key Determinant of HR versus c-NHEJ Engagement

Affiliations
Review

New Facets of DNA Double Strand Break Repair: Radiation Dose as Key Determinant of HR versus c-NHEJ Engagement

Emil Mladenov et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Radiation therapy is an essential component of present-day cancer management, utilizing ionizing radiation (IR) of different modalities to mitigate cancer progression. IR functions by generating ionizations in cells that induce a plethora of DNA lesions. The most detrimental among them are the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). In the course of evolution, cells of higher eukaryotes have evolved four major DSB repair pathways: classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), alternative end-joining (alt-EJ), and single strand annealing (SSA). These mechanistically distinct repair pathways have different cell cycle- and homology-dependencies but, surprisingly, they operate with widely different fidelity and kinetics and therefore contribute unequally to cell survival and genome maintenance. It is therefore reasonable to anticipate tight regulation and coordination in the engagement of these DSB repair pathway to achieve the maximum possible genomic stability. Here, we provide a state-of-the-art review of the accumulated knowledge on the molecular mechanisms underpinning these repair pathways, with emphasis on c-NHEJ and HR. We discuss factors and processes that have recently come to the fore. We outline mechanisms steering DSB repair pathway choice throughout the cell cycle, and highlight the critical role of DNA end resection in this process. Most importantly, however, we point out the strong preference for HR at low DSB loads, and thus low IR doses, for cells irradiated in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. We further explore the molecular underpinnings of transitions from high fidelity to low fidelity error-prone repair pathways and analyze the coordination and consequences of this transition on cell viability and genomic stability. Finally, we elaborate on how these advances may help in the development of improved cancer treatment protocols in radiation therapy.

Keywords: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs); RAD51; cancer therapy; homologous recombination (HR); ionizing radiation (IR); radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DSB repair pathways and their activity throughout the cell cycle. DNA end resection is the main delimiter of DSB repair pathway engagement. Thus, DSB repair pathways are categorized as DNA end resection independent (c-NHEJ) and DNA end resection dependent (HR, alt-EJ, and SSA). C-NHEJ operates with similar efficiency throughout the entire cell cycle, while HR, alt-EJ, and SSA are more active in S- and G2-phase, where resection activities are typically higher.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proteins involved in the regulation of DNA end resection. DNA end resection is initiated by DSB recognition through the MRN complex, comprised of MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1, which subsequently recruits BRCA1-activated CtIP to initiate short-range DNA end resection. The c-NHEJ factors, KU70/80 and DNA-PKcs, are thought to inhibit DNA end resection. Multiple factors regulate CtIP recruitment and activation at DSBs. Newly identified positive and negative regulators of DNA end resection are depicted. Long-range resection is initiated by the recruitment of EXO1 and BLM/DNA2 activities and may be further promoted by the WRN/RECQL complex. Long-range resection results in the generation of long single strand 3′-overhangs, coated by RPA, that promote RAD51 nucleoprotein filament formation and HR. Accidents in the initiation of long-range resection or RAD51 filament formation may cause shifts in DSB repair to mutagenic pathways.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose-dependent regulation of DSB repair pathway choice. (A,B) Idealized dose response curves of γ-H2AX and RAD51 foci formation depicting the linear increase of γ-H2AX foci with increasing radiation dose and the saturation of RAD51 foci at higher IR-doses. The plots show fictive data points based on previously published results. (C) The numbers of RAD51 and γ-H2AX foci are used to calculate their ratio that indicates the fraction of DSBs processed by HR (HR repair, %). It is evident that HR contributes more to DSB repair at low IR doses, while its contribution at high doses is reduced. (D) Diagram showing estimates of the relative involvement of the different DSB repair pathways with increasing DSB-load. It is evident that c-NHEJ is the dominant repair pathway at medium and high DSB-loads, while HR is engaged at low DSB loads. Alternative forms of DSB repair gain ground when HR is suppressed at high doses. Moreover, under conditions of excessive DNA end resection (high-DSB load), SSA is promoted and significantly contributes to the repair of DSBs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ward J.F. The yield of DNA double-strand breaks produced intracellularly by ionizing radiation: A review. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1990;57:1141–1150. doi: 10.1080/09553009014551251. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujii S., Sobol R.W., Fuchs R.P. Double-strand breaks: When DNA repair events accidentally meet. DNA Repair. 2022;112:103303. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103303. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mladenova V., Mladenov E., Stuschke M., Iliakis G. DNA Damage Clustering after Ionizing Radiation and Consequences in the Processing of Chromatin Breaks. Molecules. 2022;27:1540. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051540. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iliakis G., Mladenov E., Mladenova V. Necessities in the Processing of DNA Double Strand Breaks and Their Effects on Genomic Instability and Cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:1671. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parshad R., Sanford K.K. Radiation-induced chromatid breaks and deficient DNA repair in cancer predisposition. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2001;37:87–96. doi: 10.1016/S1040-8428(00)00111-6. - DOI - PubMed