Background: Training schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can increase the number of qualified people in the community, which in turn can improve survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Medical students could be a valuable resource for providing the training. This systematic review aims to determine the outcomes of medical students providing CPR training to schoolchildren, aged 13-18 (who are thought to have the strength for effective chest compression), specifically CPR skills for both and non-technical skills such as communication and leadership for medical students.

Methods: A literature search of academic databases was conducted on 5 July 2023 using the following keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, basic life support, medical students and high/middle/secondary school students. For the purpose of this review, "schoolchildren" refer to those aged 13-18. Studies were included where the primary focus was medical students teaching CPR to schoolchildren. The studies were critically appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) tool and outcomes categorised by Kirkpatrick's Levels.

Results: Eleven studies were included, six randomised controlled trials and five cohort studies, with 1670 schoolchildren and 355 medical students as participants. Eight studies examined outcomes targeting schoolchildren, two examined outcomes for medical students and one examined both. Four of the eleven studies used validated outcome measures. Only outcomes at Kirkpatrick Level 1 and 2 were found, and all outcomes for both schoolchildren and medical students were positive. Schoolchildren showed improvements in theoretical and practical elements of CPR post-training, while medical students demonstrated improved professional practice skills such as leadership and mentorship as well as improvements in their own CPR skills post-teaching.

Conclusions: Schoolchildren can effectively acquire CPR skills through being trained by medical students, who themselves also benefit from improved CPR and professional practice skills after teaching. Further studies with robust methodology such as multi-site randomised controlled trials, the use of consistent and validated outcome measures, and the measurement of outcomes at higher Kirkpatrick levels to determine the impact on bystander CPR rates and community OHCA survival rates, are needed.