Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 27;32(169):230103.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0103-2023. Print 2023 Sep 30.

Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review

Delphine Vauterin et al. Eur Respir Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 report recommends medication adherence assessment in COPD as an action item. Healthcare databases provide opportunities for objective assessments; however, multiple methods exist. We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe existing methods to assess adherence in COPD in healthcare databases and to evaluate the reporting of influencing variables.

Method: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase for peer-reviewed articles evaluating adherence to COPD medication in electronic databases, written in English, published up to 11 October 2022 (PROSPERO identifier CRD42022363449). Two reviewers independently conducted screening for inclusion and performed data extraction. Methods to assess initiation (dispensing of medication after prescribing), implementation (extent of use over a specific time period) and/or persistence (time from initiation to discontinuation) were listed descriptively. Each included study was evaluated for reporting variables with an impact on adherence assessment: inpatient stays, drug substitution, dose switching and early refills.

Results: 160 studies were included, of which four assessed initiation, 135 implementation and 45 persistence. Overall, one method was used to measure initiation, 43 methods for implementation and seven methods for persistence. Most of the included implementation studies reported medication possession ratio, proportion of days covered and/or an alteration of these methods. Only 11% of the included studies mentioned the potential impact of the evaluated variables.

Conclusion: Variations in adherence assessment methods are common. Attention to transparency, reporting of variables with an impact on adherence assessment and rationale for choosing an adherence cut-off or treatment gap is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Outside this manuscript, J.K. Quint received grants paid to her institution from the Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asthma + Lung UK and AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Evidera, AstraZeneca and Insmed. None of which are related to the content of this work. Outside this manuscript, K. Verhamme received unconditional research grants paid to her institution from Chiesi, Amgen, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). None of which are related to the content of this work. Outside this manuscript, L. Lahousse received a consulting fee paid to her institution from AstraZeneca and honoraria for lectures paid to her institution from Chiesi and IPSA vzw, a non-profit organisation facilitating lifelong learning for healthcare providers. L. Lahousse is an unpaid member of European Respiratory Society and Belgian Respiratory Society, member of Faculty board of Ghent University – Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and faculty committees. None of which are related to the content of this work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. #: articles could be excluded based on more than one reason.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . The Top 10 Causes of Death. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Date last updated: 9 December 2020. Date last accessed: 9 May 2023.
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) . Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of COPD: 2023 Report. https://goldcopd.org/2023-gold-report-2/. Date last updated: 14 November 2022. Date last accessed: 5 January 2023.
    1. Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, et al. . Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15: 565–574. doi:10.1002/pds.1230 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnet I, Kooij MJ, Messerli M, et al. . Proposal of standardization to assess adherence with medication records: methodology matters. Ann Pharmacother 2016; 50: 360–368. doi:10.1177/1060028016634106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams AB, Amico KR, Bova C, et al. . A proposal for quality standards for measuring medication adherence in research. AIDS Behav 2013; 17: 284–297. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0172-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms