Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 21;21(1):646.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04525-5.

Proteome-wide mendelian randomization study implicates therapeutic targets in common cancers

Affiliations

Proteome-wide mendelian randomization study implicates therapeutic targets in common cancers

Feihong Ren et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: The interest in targeted cancer therapies has been growing rapidly. While numerous cancer biomarkers and targeted treatment strategies have been developed and employed, there are still significant limitations and challenges in the early diagnosis and targeted treatment of cancers. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to identify novel targets and develop new targeted drugs.

Methods: The study was conducted using combined cis-Mendelian randomization (cis-MR) and colocalization analysis. We analyzed data from 732 plasma proteins to identify potential drug targets associated with eight site-specific cancers. These findings were further validated using the UK Biobank dataset. Then, a protein-protein interaction network was also constructed to examine the interplay between the identified proteins and the targets of existing cancer medications.

Results: This MR analysis revealed associations between five plasma proteins and prostate cancer, five with breast cancer, and three with lung cancer. Subsequently, these proteins were classified into four distinct target groups, with a focus on tier 1 and 2 targets due to their higher potential to become drug targets. Our study indicatied that genetically predicted KDELC2 (OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) and TNFRSF10B (OR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83) are inversely associated with prostate cancer. Furthermore, we observed an inverse association between CPNE1 (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98) and breast cancer, while PDIA3 (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30) were found to be associated with the risk of breast cancer. In addition, we also propose that SPINT2 (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), GSTP1 (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90), and CTSS (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.95) may serve as potential therapeutic targets in prostate cancer. Similarly, GDI2 (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91), ISLR2 (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93), and CTSF (OR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21) could potentially be targets for breast cancer. Additionally, we identified SFTPB (OR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95), ICAM5 (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), and FLRT3 (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15) as potential targets for lung cancer. Notably, TNFRSF10B, GSTP1, and PDIA3 were found to interact with the target proteins of current medications used in prostate or breast cancer treatment.

Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis has highlighted thirteen plasma proteins with potential roles in three site-specific cancers. Continued research in this area may reveal their therapeutic potential, particularly KDELC2, TNFRSF10B, CPNE1, and PDIA3, paving the way for more effective cancer treatments.

Keywords: Cancers; Drug target prediction; Mendelian randomization; Protein quantitative trait loci.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this section.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of Mendelian randomization study revealing causality from plasma protein on site-specific cancers. PPI: protein–protein interaction; PCa: prostate cancer; BRCa: breast cancer; LCa: lung cancer; CCa: colorectal cancer; BLCa: bladder cancer; OCa: ovarian cancer; KCa: kidney cancer; GCa: gastric cancer; cis-pQTL: cis-protein quantitative trait loci; PPH4: posterior probability of hypothesis 4
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Volcano plots of the MR results. The association between 732 plasma and the risk of A prostate cancer, B lung cancer, and C breast cancer. OR for increased risk of cancers were expressed as per SD increase in plasma protein levels. ln: natural logarithm; PVE: proportion of variance explained
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Casual effects of MR Analysis between thirteen identified proteins and three site-specific cancers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kocarnik JM, Compton K, Dean FE, Fu W, Gaw BL, Harvey JD, et al. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(3):420–444. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6987. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overman MJ, Modak J, Kopetz S, Murthy R, Yao JC, Hicks ME, et al. Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):17–22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao M, Wei F, Sun G, Wen Y, Xiang J, Su F, et al. Natural compounds targeting glycolysis as promising therapeutics for gastric cancer: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1004383. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1004383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types