Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 11;15(7):1929.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071929.

Synthesis, Characterization, Theoretical and Experimental Anticancer Evaluation of Novel Cocrystals of 5-Fluorouracil and Schiff Bases against SW480 Colorectal Carcinoma

Affiliations

Synthesis, Characterization, Theoretical and Experimental Anticancer Evaluation of Novel Cocrystals of 5-Fluorouracil and Schiff Bases against SW480 Colorectal Carcinoma

Farhat Jubeen et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

The chemotherapeutic agent known as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is an artificial fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite that has been widely used for its antineoplastic properties. Cocrystals of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with five different Schiff bases (benzylidene-urea (BU), benzylidene-aniline (BA), salicylidene-aniline (SA), salicylidene-phenylhydrazine (SPH), and para-hydroxy benzylideneaniline (HBA)) are reported in this study. The newly synthesized cocrystals were analyzed by FTIR and PXRD. In this study, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of 5-FU derivatives in SW480 colon cancer cells via MTT assay at varying dose concentrations. Molecular docking was performed to predict the binding mechanism of TS with various 5-FU complexes. FTIR revealed the presence of respective functional groups in the prepared cocrystals. The frequencies (v) of N-H (3220.24 cm-1) and carbonyl groups (1662.38 cm-1) in the spectrum of 5-FU shifted considerably in all derivative cocrystal new interactions. There was a noticeable transformation in the PXRD peak of 5-FU at 2θ = 28.37° in all derivatives. The novelty of the present study lies in the fact that 5-FU-BA showed an anticancer potential IC50 (6.4731) far higher than that of 5-FU (12.116), almost comparable to that of the reference drug doxorubicin (3.3159), against SW480 cancel cell lines, followed by 5-Fu-HBA (10.2174). The inhibition rates of 5-FU-BA and 5-FU-HBA were highest among the derivatives (99.85% and 99.37%, respectively) in comparison with doxorubicin (97.103%). The results revealed that the synthesized 5-FU cocrystals have promising antitumor efficacy compared with previously reported 5-FU and 5-FU. The activities of the cocrystals were rationalized by a molecular modeling approach to envisage binding modes with the target cancer protein.

Keywords: 5-FU; MTT assay; Schiff bases; cocrystallization; computational study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Structures of Schiff bases synthesized using urea, aniline, and phenyl hydrazine as amines and benzaldehyde, ortho-hydroxy benzaldehyde, and p-hydroxy benzaldehyde as aldehydes.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed mode of interaction between 5-FU and BA Schiff base.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proposed mode of interaction between 5-FU and the BU Schiff base.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed mode of interaction between 5-FU and the SA Schiff base.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed mode of interaction between 5-FU and the SPH Schiff base.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proposed mode of interaction between 5-FU and the HBA Schiff base.
Figure 6
Figure 6
PXRD spectral analysis of (a) 5-FU; (b) 5-FU-BA; (c) 5-FU-BU; (d) 5-FU-SA; (e) 5-FU-SPH; and (f) 5-FU-HBA.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Interaction diagram of the protein–ligand complex of TS and 5-FU.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Interaction diagram of the protein–ligand complex of TS and 5-FU-BU.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Interaction diagram of the protein–ligand complex of TS and 5-FU-SA.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Interaction diagram of the protein–ligand complex of TS and 5-FU-SPH.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Interaction diagram of the protein–ligand complex of TS and 5-FU-HBA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heidelberger C., Chaudhuri N.K., Danneberg P., Mooren D., Griesbach L., Duschinsky R., Schnitzer R.J., Pleven E., Scheiner J. Fluorinated Pyrimidines, A New Class of Tumour-Inhibitory Compounds. Nature. 1957;179:663–666. doi: 10.1038/179663a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sher F., Iqbal S.Z., Jubeen F. Future of 5-fluorouracil in cancer therapeutics, current pharmacokinetics issues and a way forward. J. Cancer Res. Pract. 2019;6:155. doi: 10.4103/JCRP.JCRP_10_19. - DOI
    1. Alter P., Herzum M., Soufi M., Schaefer J.R., Maisch B. Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Cardiovasc. Hematol. Agents Med. Chem. 2006;4:1–5. doi: 10.2174/187152506775268785. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Latchman J., Guastella A., Tofthagen C. 5-Fluorouracil Toxicity and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Enzyme: Implications for Practice. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2014;18:581–585. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.581-585. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Entezar-Almahdi E., Mohammadi-Samani S., Tayebi L., Farjadian F. Recent Advances in Designing 5-Fluorouracil Delivery Systems: A Stepping Stone in the Safe Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020;15:5445–5458. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S257700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources