Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;14(5):2152-2167.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13292. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

A single-cell atlas of bovine skeletal muscle reveals mechanisms regulating intramuscular adipogenesis and fibrogenesis

Affiliations

A single-cell atlas of bovine skeletal muscle reveals mechanisms regulating intramuscular adipogenesis and fibrogenesis

Leshan Wang et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Intramuscular fat (IMF) and intramuscular connective tissue (IMC) are often seen in human myopathies and are central to beef quality. The mechanisms regulating their accumulation remain poorly understood. Here, we explored the possibility of using beef cattle as a novel model for mechanistic studies of intramuscular adipogenesis and fibrogenesis.

Methods: Skeletal muscle single-cell RNAseq was performed on three cattle breeds, including Wagyu (high IMF), Brahman (abundant IMC but scarce IMF), and Wagyu/Brahman cross. Sophisticated bioinformatics analyses, including clustering analysis, gene set enrichment analyses, gene regulatory network construction, RNA velocity, pseudotime analysis, and cell-cell communication analysis, were performed to elucidate heterogeneities and differentiation processes of individual cell types and differences between cattle breeds. Experiments were conducted to validate the function and specificity of identified key regulatory and marker genes. Integrated analysis with multiple published human and non-human primate datasets was performed to identify common mechanisms.

Results: A total of 32 708 cells and 21 clusters were identified, including fibro/adipogenic progenitor (FAP) and other resident and infiltrating cell types. We identified an endomysial adipogenic FAP subpopulation enriched for COL4A1 and CFD (log2FC = 3.19 and 1.92, respectively; P < 0.0001) and a perimysial fibrogenic FAP subpopulation enriched for COL1A1 and POSTN (log2FC = 1.83 and 0.87, respectively; P < 0.0001), both of which were likely derived from an unspecified subpopulation. Further analysis revealed more progressed adipogenic programming of Wagyu FAPs and more advanced fibrogenic programming of Brahman FAPs. Mechanistically, NAB2 drives CFD expression, which in turn promotes adipogenesis. CFD expression in FAPs of young cattle before the onset of intramuscular adipogenesis was predictive of IMF contents in adulthood (R2 = 0.885, P < 0.01). Similar adipogenic and fibrogenic FAPs were identified in humans and monkeys. In aged humans with metabolic syndrome and progressed Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients, increased CFD expression was observed (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively), which was positively correlated with adipogenic marker expression, including ADIPOQ (R2 = 0.303, P < 0.01; and R2 = 0.348, P < 0.01, respectively). The specificity of Postn/POSTN as a fibrogenic FAP marker was validated using a lineage-tracing mouse line. POSTN expression was elevated in Brahman FAPs (P < 0.0001) and DMD patients (P < 0.01) but not in aged humans. Strong interactions between vascular cells and FAPs were also identified.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of beef cattle as a model for studying IMF and IMC. We illustrate the FAP programming during intramuscular adipogenesis and fibrogenesis and reveal the reliability of CFD as a predictor and biomarker of IMF accumulation in cattle and humans.

Keywords: Adipogenesis; Fibro/adipogenic progenitor; Fibrogenesis; Intramuscular adipose tissue; Single-cell RNAseq.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
scRNAseq reveals multiple muscle‐resident and circulating cell types in bovine SkM. (A) UMAP graphs show unsupervised clustering of cells from all breeds and individual breeds identified by scRNAseq. (B) A heatmap shows the expression of representative marker genes used in cell‐type annotation. (C) Pie graphs show the non‐immune muscle‐resident cell type composition in all breeds and individual breeds revealed by scRNAseq. FAP, fibro/adipogenic progenitor; VEndoC, venular endothelial cell; MuC, mural cell; MC, myogenic cell; LEndoc, lymphatic endothelial cell; Mo/Ma, monocyte/macrophage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
scRNAseq reveals communications between FAPs and other cell types in Wagyu muscle. (A) Cell–cell communication networks include all identified significant communications between different cell types in individual breeds identified by scRNAseq. (B) A heatmap shows the differential cell–cell communications in which FAP‐1 or FAP‐2 functions as the sender between Wagyu and Brahman. The red box highlights VEGF signalling communications from FAPs to EndoCs only detected in Wagyu. The blue box highlights DAG1 signalling communications from FAPs to MCs only detected in Brahman. Values are the ratios of communication probability scores in Wagyu to those in Brahman.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bovine FAPs are a heterogeneous population. (A) UMAP graphs show unsupervised clustering of bovine FAPs from all breeds identified by scRNAseq. (B) A dot plot shows the expression of select DEGs among FAP subpopulations. (C) Graphs show the enrichment of select GOBP and Wikipathways terms in FAP C3 and C4. (D) RNA velocity graphs in which different FAPs subpopulations or FAPs of different breeds are differentially labelled. (E) Feature plots show select DEGs among FAP subpopulations. (F) A GRN regulates the differential gene expression among FAP clusters.
Figure 4
Figure 4
scRNAseq suggests active myogenesis in cattle at 4 months of age. (A) UMAP graphs show unsupervised clustering of bovine MCs from all breeds and individual breeds identified by scRNAseq. (B) Violin plots show the expression of select DEGs among different MC subpopulations. (C) RNA velocity analysis of MCs. (D) Pseudotime analysis of MCs. (E) Feature plots show the expression of indicated myosin heavy chain genes in myonuclei identified by scRNAseq, and a pie graph shows the muscle fibre type composition revealed by scRNAseq.
Figure 5
Figure 5
An analysis of MuCs reveals distinct VSMC and pericyte populations. (A) UMAP graphs show unsupervised clustering of bovine MuCs from all breeds and individual breeds identified by scRNAseq. (B) Feature plots show the expression of select DEGs among different MuC subpopulations. (C) RNA velocity of MuCs. (D) Pseudotime analysis of MuCs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
scRNAseq suggests differential activities between Wagyu and Brahman FAPs. (A) A UMAP graph shows bovine FAP C3 from different breeds and a dot plot shows the expression of select DEGs in Wagyu, crossbred, and Brahman FAP C3. (B) Pseudotime analysis of FAP C3 from all breeds and graphs showing the expression of select DEGs along the FAP C3 pseudotime trajectory. (C) A UMAP graph shows bovine FAP C3 from different breeds and a dot plot shows the expression of select DEGs in Wagyu, crossbred, and Brahman FAP C4. (D) Violin plots show the expression of COL1A1 and POSTN in different FAP subpopulations of different breeds. (E) Pseudotime analysis of FAP C4 from all breeds and graphs showing the expression of select DEGs along the FAP C4 pseudotime trajectory. (F) Heatmaps with dendrograms show the expression of the top 50 upregulated genes in Wagyu and Brahman FAP C3 or C4 in Wagyu, Brahman, and crossbred C3 or C4. Individual cells were clustered and connected based on similarities in gene expression.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The greater adipogenic potential of Wagyu FAPs is at least partially due to higher CFD expression and less robust fibrogenic programming. (A) Oil Red O staining and ICC show the adipogenic efficiency and the myofibroblast differentiation capacities of FAPs indicated by SMαA signal strength of FAPs from different breeds, respectively. The purity of FAPs was verified by PDGFRα staining. Scale bar: 50 μm (Oil Red O), 100 μm (ICC). n = 3 for each breed. (B) Brahman FAPs were transduced with Lenti‐GFP or Lenti‐CFD and induced for adipogenesis. Adipogenesis was evaluated by LipidTOX staining. The expression of GFP and CFD was verified by ICC using anti‐GFP and anti‐HA tag antibodies. n = 3 for each treatment. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Wagyu FAPs were treated with C3aR inhibitor (INH) or vehicle (CTL) and induced for adipogenesis. Adipogenesis was evaluated by LipidTOX staining. n = 3 for each treatment. (D) The correlation between IMF content and CFD expression in FAPs, Mo/Ma, and granulocytes. (E) Wagyu FAPs were transduced with Lenti‐shGFP or Lenti‐shNAB2. The expression levels of NAB2 and CFD were measured 2 days after transduction by realtime PCR. (F) Postn MCM/+ ;R26 eGFP mice were treated with tamoxifen from day 0 to day 3 after CTX or glycerol injections, followed by sample collection on day 7 after the CTX injection or day 14 after the glycerol injection. Muscle samples were subjected to IHC to identify Postn lineage cells (GFP+), FAPs (Pdgfrα+), myofibroblasts (Pdgfrα+;SMαA+, CTX injected), and adipocytes (perilipin‐1+, glycerol injected). The adipogenic efficiencies of Postn‐lineage FAPs [(GFP+;perilipin‐1+ cell number)/(GFP+;Pdgfrα+ cell number)] and non‐Postn‐lineage FAPs [(GFP;perilipin‐1+ cell number)/ (GFP;Pdgfrα+ cellnumber)] were calculated. n = 4 for each breed. Scale bar: 50 μm. (G) Representative IHC images show the locations of collagen I, collagen IV, and FAPs (PDGFRα+) in Wagyu and Brahman muscles. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. COL I, collagen I; COL IV, collagen IV.
Figure 8
Figure 8
An analysis reveals common mechanisms regulating bovine and human IMF and IMC accumulation. (A) Heatmaps show the expression of select adipogenic and fibrogenic genes in bovine, human, monkey, and uninjured WT mouse FAP clusters. (B, C) The differential expression of select adipogenic and fibrogenic genes in human SkM among young, old, and old with metabolic syndrome individuals (B). The correlation between the expression of select genes and the expression of CFD in human SkM across all groups (C). (D) The differential expression of select adipogenic and fibrogenic genes in human SkM between DMD patients and healthy controls aged 1 year or less. (E) The differential expression of select adipogenic and fibrogenic genes in SkM between DMD patients and healthy controls aged 2 to 8 years (left) and expression correlation between these genes (right). (F) A schematic diagram of the proposed mechanism regulating IMF and IMC accumulation in cattle and humans. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rahemi H, Nigam N, Wakeling JM. The effect of intramuscular fat on skeletal muscle mechanics: implications for the elderly and obese. J R Soc Interface 2015;12:20150365. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li W, Zheng Y, Zhang W, Wang Z, Xiao J, Yuan Y. Progression and variation of fatty infiltration of the thigh muscles in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a muscle magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuromuscul Disord 2015;25:375–380. - PubMed
    1. van Putten M, Lloyd EM, de Greef JC, Raz V, Willmann R, Grounds MD. Mouse models for muscular dystrophies: an overview. Dis Model Mech 2020;13:dmm043562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dubost A, Micol D, Picard B, Lethias C, Andueza D, Bauchart D, et al. Structural and biochemical characteristics of bovine intramuscular connective tissue and beef quality. Meat Sci 2013;95:555–561. - PubMed
    1. Phelps K, Johnson D, Elzo M, Paulk C, Gonzalez J. Effect of Brahman genetics on myofibrillar protein degradation, collagen crosslinking, and tenderness of the longissimus lumborum. J Anim Sci 2017;95:5397–5406. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types