Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study
- PMID: 37405825
- PMCID: PMC10357314
- DOI: 10.2196/47210
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study
Abstract
Background: Liver cancer incidence has been increasing in China in the recent years, leading to increased public concern regarding the burden of this disease. Short videos on liver cancer are disseminated through TikTok and Bilibili apps, which have gained popularity in recent years as an easily accessible source of health information. However, the credibility, quality, and usefulness of the information in these short videos and the professional knowledge of the individuals uploading health information-based videos in these platforms have not yet been evaluated.
Objective: Our study aims to assess the quality of the information in Chinese short videos on liver cancer shared on the TikTok and Bilibili short video-sharing platforms.
Methods: In March 2023, we assessed the top 100 Chinese short videos on liver cancer in TikTok and Bilibili (200 videos in total) for their information quality and reliability by using 2 rating tools, namely, global quality score (GQS) and the DISCERN instrument. Correlation and Poisson regression analyses were applied to discuss the factors that could impact video quality.
Results: Compared to Bilibili, TikTok is more popular, although the length of the videos on TikTok is shorter than that of the videos on Bilibili (P<.001). The quality of the short videos on liver cancer in TikTok and Bilibili was not satisfactory, with median GQS of 3 (IQR 2-4) and 2 (IQR 1-5) and median DISCERN scores of 5 (IQR 4-6) and 4 (IQR 2-7), respectively. In general, the quality of videos sourced from professional institutions and individuals was better than that of those sourced from nonprofessionals, and videos involving disease-related knowledge were of better quality than those covering news and reports. No significant differences were found in the quality of videos uploaded by individuals from different professions, with the exception of those uploaded by traditional Chinese medicine professionals, which demonstrated poorer quality. Only video shares were positively correlated with the GQS (r=0.17, P=.01), and no video variables could predict the video quality.
Conclusions: Our study shows that the quality of short videos on health information related to liver cancer is poor on Bilibili and TikTok, but videos uploaded by health care professionals can be considered reliable in terms of comprehensiveness and content quality. Thus, short videos providing medical information on TikTok and Bilibili must be carefully considered for scientific soundness by active information seekers before they make decisions on their health care management.
Keywords: Bilibili; DISCERN; GQS; TikTok; global quality score; information quality; liver cancer; reliability; short videos; social media.
©Shusen Zheng, Xinyu Tong, Dalong Wan, Chen Hu, Qing Hu, Qinghong Ke. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 05.07.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38317686 Free PMC article.
-
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38877432 Free PMC article.
-
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.Helicobacter. 2023 Oct;28(5):e13007. doi: 10.1111/hel.13007. Epub 2023 Jul 15. Helicobacter. 2023. PMID: 37452727
-
Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review.Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Int J Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 38531256 Review.
-
#Neurosurgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neurosurgical Content on TikTok.World Neurosurg X. 2022 Sep 9;17:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100137. eCollection 2023 Jan. World Neurosurg X. 2022. PMID: 36204176 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Myopia information on TikTok: analysis factors that impact video quality and audience engagement.BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):1194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18687-4. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38685020 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38317686 Free PMC article.
-
Douyin and Bilibili as sources of information on lung cancer in China through assessment and analysis of the content and quality.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70640-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39232044 Free PMC article.
-
The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241288831. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288831. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39381823 Free PMC article.
-
Public Fear of Pancreatic Diseases: Causes and Clinical Outcomes at a Single Korean Center.Gut Liver. 2024 Jul 15;18(4):756-760. doi: 10.5009/gnl240241. Epub 2024 Jun 28. Gut Liver. 2024. PMID: 38938175 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, Lesi O, Cabasag CJ, Vignat J, Laversanne M, McGlynn KA, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol. 2022 Dec;77(6):1598–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168-8278(22)03022-7 S0168-8278(22)03022-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Huang D, Singal A, Kono Y, Tan D, El-Serag H, Loomba Rohit. Changing global epidemiology of liver cancer from 2010 to 2019: NASH is the fastest growing cause of liver cancer. Cell Metab. 2022 Jul 05;34(7):969–977.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.05.003. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/35793659 S1550-4131(22)00185-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;16(10):589–604. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31439937 10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical