Comparing 7-Day Versus 6-8-Day Penicillin Treatment Intervals Among Pregnant People With Syphilis of Late or Unknown Duration: No Difference Found in Incidence of Congenital Syphilis

doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad300

. 2023 Jun 8;10(6):ofad300.

doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad300. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Comparing 7-Day Versus 6-8-Day Penicillin Treatment Intervals Among Pregnant People With Syphilis of Late or Unknown Duration: No Difference Found in Incidence of Congenital Syphilis

Kelly A Johnson^{1

2}, Nicole O Burghardt¹, Robert E Snyder¹, Rosalyn E Plotzker^{1

3}, Brandon M Imp⁴, Ryan Murphy¹, Kathleen Jacobson¹, Eric C Tang¹

Affiliations

¹ Sexually Transmitted Diseases Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
² Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
³ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
⁴ Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

PMID: 37389226
PMCID: PMC10300633
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad300

Comparing 7-Day Versus 6-8-Day Penicillin Treatment Intervals Among Pregnant People With Syphilis of Late or Unknown Duration: No Difference Found in Incidence of Congenital Syphilis

Kelly A Johnson et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023.

. 2023 Jun 8;10(6):ofad300.

doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad300. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Authors

Kelly A Johnson^{1

2}, Nicole O Burghardt¹, Robert E Snyder¹, Rosalyn E Plotzker^{1

3}, Brandon M Imp⁴, Ryan Murphy¹, Kathleen Jacobson¹, Eric C Tang¹

Affiliations

¹ Sexually Transmitted Diseases Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
² Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
³ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
⁴ Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

PMID: 37389226
PMCID: PMC10300633
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad300

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend that pregnant patients with syphilis of late/unknown duration be treated with benzathine penicillin G, dosed as 3 weekly intramuscular injections (BPGx3) given ideally at strict 7-day intervals. Given limited pharmacokinetic data, it is unknown whether more flexible BPG treatment intervals might be effective in preventing congenital syphilis (CS).

Methods: We used California surveillance data to identify birthing parent/infant dyads wherein the pregnant parent had syphilis of late/unknown duration between January 1, 2016 - June 30, 2019. We divided the dyads into 3 groups based on prenatal treatment: (1) BPGx3 at strict 7-day intervals, (2) BPGx3 at 6-8 day intervals, and (3) no/inadequate treatment. We then compared CS incidence among infants in each group.

Results: We analyzed 1,092 parent/infant dyads: 607 (55.6%) in the 7-day treatment group, 70 (6.4%) in the 6-8 day treatment group, and 415 (38.0%) in the no/inadequate treatment group. The incidence proportion of infants meeting CS criteria in each group was, respectively, 5.6%, 5.7%, and 36.9%. Compared with BPGx3 at 7-day intervals, the odds of CS were 1.0 [95% CI 0.4-3.0] in the 6-8 day group and 9.8 [95% CI 6.6-14.7] in the no/inadequate treatment group.

Conclusions: Prenatal BPGx3 at 6-8 days was no more likely to lead to CS in infants than 7-days. These findings hint that 6-8-day intervals might be adequate to prevent CS among pregnant people with syphilis of late/unknown duration. Consequently, it is possible that CS evaluation beyond an RPR at delivery may be unnecessary in asymptomatic infants whose parents received BPGx3 at 6-8 days.

Keywords: congenital syphilis; sexually transmitted infections (STIs); syphilis in pregnancy; syphilis prevention; syphilis treatment intervals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: no reported conflicts.

Figures

**Graphical Abstract**
This graphical abstract is also available at Tidbit: https://tidbitapp.io/tidbits/comparing-7-vs-6-8-day-penicillin-treatment-intervals-among-pregnant-people-with-syphilis-of-late-or-unknown-duration-no-difference-found-in-incidence-of-congenital-syphilis

See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/2020-SR-4-10-2023.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2022.
1. California Department of Public Health STD Control Branch . 2019 STD surveillance report—executive summary. Available at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/2019.... Accessed 27 July 2022.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Congenital syphilis—CDC fact sheet. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/stdfact-congenital-syphilis.htm. Accessed 27 July 2022.
1. Plotzker RE, Murphy RD, Stoltey JE. Congenital syphilis prevention: strategies, evidence, and future directions. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45:S29–37. - PubMed
1. Galvis AE, Arrieta A. Congenital syphilis: a U.S. Perspective. Children (Basel) 2020; 7:203. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/2020-SR-4-10-2023.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2022.

[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/2020-SR-4-10-2023.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2022.

[3] California Department of Public Health STD Control Branch . 2019 STD surveillance report—executive summary. Available at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/2019.... Accessed 27 July 2022.

[4] California Department of Public Health STD Control Branch . 2019 STD surveillance report—executive summary. Available at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/2019.... Accessed 27 July 2022.

[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Congenital syphilis—CDC fact sheet. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/stdfact-congenital-syphilis.htm. Accessed 27 July 2022.

[6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Congenital syphilis—CDC fact sheet. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/stdfact-congenital-syphilis.htm. Accessed 27 July 2022.

[7] Plotzker RE, Murphy RD, Stoltey JE. Congenital syphilis prevention: strategies, evidence, and future directions. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45:S29–37. - PubMed

[8] Plotzker RE, Murphy RD, Stoltey JE. Congenital syphilis prevention: strategies, evidence, and future directions. Sex Transm Dis 2018; 45:S29–37. - PubMed

[9] Galvis AE, Arrieta A. Congenital syphilis: a U.S. Perspective. Children (Basel) 2020; 7:203. - PMC - PubMed

[10] Galvis AE, Arrieta A. Congenital syphilis: a U.S. Perspective. Children (Basel) 2020; 7:203. - PMC - PubMed

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Comparing 7-Day Versus 6-8-Day Penicillin Treatment Intervals Among Pregnant People With Syphilis of Late or Unknown Duration: No Difference Found in Incidence of Congenital Syphilis

Affiliations

Comparing 7-Day Versus 6-8-Day Penicillin Treatment Intervals Among Pregnant People With Syphilis of Late or Unknown Duration: No Difference Found in Incidence of Congenital Syphilis

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Similar articles

References

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Similar articles

References

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources