Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 18;12(10):3536.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12103536.

The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Assistance on the Radiologists' Assessment of Lung Nodules on CT Scans: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Assistance on the Radiologists' Assessment of Lung Nodules on CT Scans: A Systematic Review

Lotte J S Ewals et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

To reduce the number of missed or misdiagnosed lung nodules on CT scans by radiologists, many Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed. Some algorithms are currently being implemented in clinical practice, but the question is whether radiologists and patients really benefit from the use of these novel tools. This study aimed to review how AI assistance for lung nodule assessment on CT scans affects the performances of radiologists. We searched for studies that evaluated radiologists' performances in the detection or malignancy prediction of lung nodules with and without AI assistance. Concerning detection, radiologists achieved with AI assistance a higher sensitivity and AUC, while the specificity was slightly lower. Concerning malignancy prediction, radiologists achieved with AI assistance generally a higher sensitivity, specificity and AUC. The radiologists' workflows of using the AI assistance were often only described in limited detail in the papers. As recent studies showed improved performances of radiologists with AI assistance, AI assistance for lung nodule assessment holds great promise. To achieve added value of AI tools for lung nodule assessment in clinical practice, more research is required on the clinical validation of AI tools, impact on follow-up recommendations and ways of using AI tools.

Keywords: X-ray computed; artificial intelligence; computer-assisted; detection; diagnosis; lung neoplasms; malignancy prediction; systematic review; tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the search for eligible studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summarized QUADAS-2 assessments of included studies concerning risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability per study (a) and per QUADAS-2 domain (b) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aberle D.R., Adams A.M., Berg C.D., Black W.C., Clapp J.D., Fagerstrom R.M., Gareen I.F., Gatsonis C., Marcus P.M., Sicks J.D. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:395–409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gu Y., Chi J., Liu J., Yang L., Zhang B., Yu D., Zhao Y., Lu X. A survey of computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules from CT scans using deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021;137:104806. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gu D., Liu G., Xue Z. On the performance of lung nodule detection, segmentation and classification. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2021;89:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101886. - DOI - PubMed