Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0348322.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03483-22. Epub 2023 May 18.

Spike-Independent Infection of Human Coronavirus 229E in Bat Cells

Affiliations

Spike-Independent Infection of Human Coronavirus 229E in Bat Cells

Marcus G Mah et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Bats are the reservoir for numerous human pathogens, including coronaviruses. Despite many coronaviruses having descended from bat ancestors, little is known about virus-host interactions and broader evolutionary history involving bats. Studies have largely focused on the zoonotic potential of coronaviruses with few infection experiments conducted in bat cells. To determine genetic changes derived from replication in bat cells and possibly identify potential novel evolutionary pathways for zoonotic virus emergence, we serially passaged six human 229E isolates in a newly established Rhinolophus lepidus (horseshoe bat) kidney cell line. Here, we observed extensive deletions within the spike and open reading frame 4 (ORF4) genes of five 229E viruses after passaging in bat cells. As a result, spike protein expression and infectivity of human cells was lost in 5 of 6 viruses, but the capability to infect bat cells was maintained. Only viruses that expressed the spike protein could be neutralized by 229E spike-specific antibodies in human cells, whereas there was no neutralizing effect on viruses that did not express the spike protein inoculated on bat cells. However, one isolate acquired an early stop codon, abrogating spike expression but maintaining infection in bat cells. After passaging this isolate in human cells, spike expression was restored due to acquisition of nucleotide insertions among virus subpopulations. Spike-independent infection of human coronavirus 229E may provide an alternative mechanism for viral maintenance in bats that does not rely on the compatibility of viral surface proteins and known cellular entry receptors. IMPORTANCE Many viruses, including coronaviruses, originated from bats. Yet, we know little about how these viruses switch between hosts and enter human populations. Coronaviruses have succeeded in establishing in humans at least five times, including endemic coronaviruses and the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In an approach to identify requirements for host switches, we established a bat cell line and adapted human coronavirus 229E viruses by serial passage. The resulting viruses lost their spike protein but maintained the ability to infect bat cells, but not human cells. Maintenance of 229E viruses in bat cells appears to be independent of a canonical spike receptor match, which in turn might facilitate cross-species transmission in bats.

Keywords: 229E; coronavirus; evolution; pandemic; receptor; receptor usage; spike; zoonotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Rhileki cells are susceptible and permissive to 229E infection. (A) Serial passage of six 229E isolates at an MOI of 0.01 in Rhileki cells. Viral genome copies of the inoculum (circles) and at 6 days postinoculation (square) are plotted. The inoculum for subsequent passages was standardized based on genome copy numbers. (B) Viral titers (TCID50/mL) in Caco2 cells of C2, C2R10, and C2R10C1 viruses after serial passage. (C) Viral titers (TCID50/mL) in Rhileki cells of C2R1 and C2R10 viruses after serial passage. Black dashed lines represent the limit of detection.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Schematic of nucleotide sequences within the spike and ORF4 gene regions. Color-filled rectangles represent parts of the genome in C2R1, C2R5, and C2R10 viruses that are present in the respective passage. Virus isolate names are in bold. Horizontal black lines indicate deleted parts of the genome with their respective size denoted by Δ; starts and ends of the deletions are indicated by the respective nucleotide position. Stop codons are denoted by an asterisk (*).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Spike protein expression and virus neutralization. (A) Western blot images of culture supernatants of Rhileki cells and Caco2 cells infected with C2R1, C2R5, C2R10, and C2R10C1 and stained with 229E anti-spike (S) and anti-nucleocapsid protein (N) antibodies. (B) Virus neutralization test, with virus titers (TCID50/mL) of C2 viruses in Caco2 cells (blue), C2 viruses in Rhileki cells (black), C2R10 viruses in Rhileki cells (brown), C2R10 viruses in Caco2 cells (red), and C2R10C1 virus in Caco2 cells for the isolate SG/2613/2011 only (green). The 229E anti-spike rabbit polyclonal sera at concentrations of 1.25 μg/mL to 80 μg/mL was incubated with the respective virus 1 h before inoculation. Blacked dashed lines indicate the limit of detection.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Genetic diversity of the SG/2613/2011 spike gene across passages. (A) Nucleotide sequences from position 21059 to 21100 and the corresponding amino acid translation within the S1 domain of the spike gene. Depending on the passage of the virus, the diversity is comprised of one to three uracil insertions at nucleotide position 21064 that alter the reading frame compared to the wild-type sequence (turquoise, line 1), GNFY-NE. With one (orange, line 2) or two (teal, line 3) uracil insertions, the reading frame shifts and leads to an early stop codon GNFL-Q* (E177*) and GNFFIAL* (L171*), respectively. At three (mustard, line 4) uracil insertions, the reading frame is restored with an additional phenylalanine GNFFY-NE. Double forward slashes (//) indicate 8 amino acid residues not shown for clarity of presentation. (B) Pie charts describe the percentage of viral genome reads with uracil insertions for C2 (100% no insertions, turquoise, n = 8,268), C2R5 (11.1% no insertions; 70.9% single insertion, orange; 18.0% double insertion, teal, n = 323), C2R10 (75.8% single insertion; 24.2% double insertion, n = 33), and C2R10C1 (11.2% no insertions; 88.8% triple insertion, mustard, n = 347) viruses. Figure was created with https://BioRender.com.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Effect of cathepsin inhibitors on C2R10 virus growth on Rhileki cells. Rhileki cells were pretreated with either 50 μM MDL28170 (turqoise) or 10 μM E64d (blue) before infection with C2R10 viruses at an MOI of 0.003. Viral genome copies were measured at 3 dpi. Cell viability towards a range of concentrations of the tested compounds were assessed. Cell viability: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 100%; 50 μM MDL28170, 89.3%; 10 μM E64d, 100%. The experiment was repeated three independent times and in triplicates. Error bars represent standard error of the mean; *, P = 0.0163; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0001.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Positive-strand RNA viruses-a Keystone Symposia report.
    Cable J, Denison MR, Kielian M, Jackson WT, Bartenschlager R, Ahola T, Mukhopadhyay S, Fremont DH, Kuhn RJ, Shannon A, Frazier MN, Yuen KY, Coyne CB, Wolthers KC, Ming GL, Guenther CS, Moshiri J, Best SM, Schoggins JW, Jurado KA, Ebel GD, Schäfer A, Ng LFP, Kikkert M, Sette A, Harris E, Wing PAC, Eggenberger J, Krishnamurthy SR, Mah MG, Meganck RM, Chung D, Maurer-Stroh S, Andino R, Korber B, Perlman S, Shi PY, Bárcena M, Aicher SM, Vu MN, Kenney DJ, Lindenbach BD, Nishida Y, Rénia L, Williams EP. Cable J, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023 Mar;1521(1):46-66. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14957. Epub 2023 Jan 25. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023. PMID: 36697369 Free PMC article.
  • A Look inside the Replication Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in Blyth's Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus lepidus) Kidney Cells.
    Auerswald H, Low DHW, Siegers JY, Ou T, Kol S, In S, Linster M, Su YCF, Mendenhall IH, Duong V, Smith GJD, Karlsson EA. Auerswald H, et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0044922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00449-22. Epub 2022 May 31. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35638834 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, Haagmans BL, Lauber C, Leontovich AM, Neuman BW, Penzar D, Perlman S, Poon LLM, Samborskiy DV, Sidorov IA, Sola I, Ziebuhr J. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2020. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 5:536–544. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. 2020. Coronavirus infections—more than just the common cold. JAMA 323:707–708. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0757. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nickbakhsh S, Ho A, Marques DFP, McMenamin J, Gunson RN, Murcia PR. 2020. Epidemiology of seasonal coronaviruses: establishing the context for the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect Dis 222:17–25. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peiris JSM, Lai ST, Poon LLM, Guan Y, Yam LYC, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WKS, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VCC, Chan KH, Tsang DNC, Yung RWH, Ng TK, Yuen KY. SARS study group. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361:1319–1325. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13077-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling A-E, Humphrey CD, Shieh W-J, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, Yang J-Y, Cox N, Hughes JM, LeDuc JW, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ. SARS Working Group. 2003. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1953–1966. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa030781. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances