Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 2;13(3):464.
doi: 10.3390/biom13030464.

Surface Treatments of PEEK for Osseointegration to Bone

Jay R Dondani  1 , Janaki Iyer  1 , Simon D Tran  1
Affiliations
Review

Surface Treatments of PEEK for Osseointegration to Bone

Jay R Dondani et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Polymers, in general, and Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) (PEEK) have emerged as potential alternatives to conventional osseous implant biomaterials. Due to its distinct advantages over metallic implants, PEEK has been gaining increasing attention as a prime candidate for orthopaedic and dental implants. However, PEEK has a highly hydrophobic and bioinert surface that attenuates the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts and leads to implant failure. Several improvements have been made to the osseointegration potential of PEEK, which can be classified into three main categories: (1) surface functionalization with bioactive agents by physical or chemical means; (2) incorporation of bioactive materials either as surface coatings or as composites; and (3) construction of three-dimensionally porous structures on its surfaces. The physical treatments, such as plasma treatments of various elements, accelerated neutron beams, or conventional techniques like sandblasting and laser or ultraviolet radiation, change the micro-geometry of the implant surface. The chemical treatments change the surface composition of PEEK and should be titrated at the time of exposure. The implant surface can be incorporated with a bioactive material that should be selected following the desired use, loading condition, and antimicrobial load around the implant. For optimal results, a combination of the methods above is utilized to compensate for the limitations of individual methods. This review summarizes these methods and their combinations for optimizing the surface of PEEK for utilization as an implanted biomaterial.

Keywords: dental implant; implant biomaterial; orthopedic implant; osseointegration; polymer; surface treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of osseointegration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Classification of surface treatments of PEEK.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Insulation of PEEK by Titanium or YSZ intermediate layer from heated HA during crystallisation process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Zheng Z., Liu P., Zhang X., Xin J., Wang Y., Zou X., Mei X., Zhang S., Zhang S. Strategies to improve bioactive and antibacterial properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for use as orthopedic implants. Mater. Today Bio. 2022;16:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma R., Tang T. Current Strategies to Improve the Bioactivity of PEEK. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:5426–5445. doi: 10.3390/ijms15045426. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S.M., Devine J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845–4869. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buck E., Li H., Cerruti M. Surface Modification Strategies to Improve the Osseointegration of Poly(etheretherketone) and Its Composites. Macromol. Biosci. 2020;20:1900271. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201900271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sagomonyants K.B., Jarman-Smith M.L., Devine J.N., Aronow M.S., Gronowicz G.A. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1563–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.001. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources