Randomized Phase II Trial of Ficlatuzumab With or Without Cetuximab in Pan-Refractory, Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
- PMID: 36977289
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01994
Randomized Phase II Trial of Ficlatuzumab With or Without Cetuximab in Pan-Refractory, Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Primary or acquired resistance to cetuximab, an antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), minimizes its utility in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Aberrant hepatocyte growth factor/cMet pathway activation is an established resistance mechanism. Dual pathway targeting may overcome resistance.
Patients and methods: This multicenter, randomized, noncomparative phase II study evaluated ficlatuzumab, an antihepatocyte growth factor mAb, with or without cetuximab in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. The primary end point was median progression-free survival (PFS); an arm met significance criteria if the lower bound of the 90% CI excluded the historical control of 2 months. Key eligibility criteria were HNSCC with known human papillomavirus (HPV) status, cetuximab resistance (progression within 6 months of exposure in the definitive or recurrent/metastatic setting), and resistance to platinum and anti-PD-1 mAb. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and the association of HPV status and cMet overexpression with efficacy. Continuous Bayesian futility monitoring was used.
Results: From 2018 to 2020, 60 patients were randomly assigned and 58 were treated. Twenty-seven versus 33 patients were allocated to monotherapy versus combination. Arms were balanced for major prognostic factors. The monotherapy arm closed early for futility. The combination arm met prespecified significance criteria with a median PFS of 3.7 months (lower bound 90% CI, 2.3 months; P = .04); the ORR was 6 of 32 (19%), including two complete and four partial responses. Exploratory analyses were limited to the combination arm: the median PFS was 2.3 versus 4.1 months (P = .03) and the ORR was 0 of 16 (0%) versus 6 of 16 (38%; P = .02) in the HPV-positive versus HPV-negative subgroups, respectively. cMet overexpression was associated with reduced hazard of progression in HPV-negative but not HPV-positive disease (P interaction = .02).
Conclusion: The ficlatuzumab-cetuximab arm met significance criteria for PFS and warrants phase III development. HPV-negative HNSCC merits consideration as a selection criterion.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03422536.
Similar articles
-
A randomized phase 2 network trial of tivantinib plus cetuximab versus cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2146-2152. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32762. Epub 2020 Feb 19. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32073648 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, phase II trial of cetuximab with or without PX-866, an irreversible oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer.Ann Oncol. 2015 Mar;26(3):556-61. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu574. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Ann Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25524478 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized phase 2 study of temsirolimus and cetuximab versus temsirolimus alone in recurrent/metastatic, cetuximab-resistant head and neck cancer: The MAESTRO study.Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;126(14):3237-3243. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32929. Epub 2020 May 4. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32365226 Clinical Trial.
-
Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:49-54. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/08. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19846029 Review.
-
[Cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;29(1):67-75. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 25966559 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Phase II Multi-institutional Clinical Trial Result of Concurrent Cetuximab and Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 1;28(11):2329-2338. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3849. Clin Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35344035 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Head and neck cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy.MedComm (2020). 2024 Aug 21;5(9):e702. doi: 10.1002/mco2.702. eCollection 2024 Sep. MedComm (2020). 2024. PMID: 39170944 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Crosstalk between CAFs and tumour cells in head and neck cancer.Cell Death Discov. 2024 Jun 26;10(1):303. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02053-9. Cell Death Discov. 2024. PMID: 38926351 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Corticosteroid-dependent immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis treated with vedolizumab: a case report.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Aug 31;15(4):1948-1956. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-222. Epub 2024 Jul 11. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39279935 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodality treatment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: current therapy, challenges, and future perspectives.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 4;13:1288695. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1288695. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38239635 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous