Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;22(3):183-191.
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i3.21.

Cytogenetic profile of adult AML patients in Turkey: a single center study with comprehensive comparison with literature

Affiliations

Cytogenetic profile of adult AML patients in Turkey: a single center study with comprehensive comparison with literature

Ayse Cirakoglu et al. Afr Health Sci. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Cytogenetic findings are important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia. Large systematic data about chromosomal characteristics of Turkish AML patients have not been reported to date.

Objectives: The karyotypic profiles of 157 adult AML patients were evaluated retrospectively and compared with other reports from different populations.

Methods: Cytogenetics analyses were performed on bone marrow samples using G-banding. Patients were categorized according to their cytogenetic results into four groups with the addition of a normal karyotyped group to the favorable, intermediate and adverse groups of European Leukemia Network.

Results: Cytogenetic analyses were carried out successfully in 138 patients (88%). Abnormal karyotypes were found in 79 (57.2%) patients of which 13 (9.4%) were in favorable, 37 (26.8%) in intermediate and 29 (21%) in adverse groups. t(8;21) (5%) was the most common favorable abnormality while monosomal karyotypes (15.9%) in adverse group.

Conclusion: This single center study is the most comprehensive study about the cytogenetic profile of acute myeloid leukemia in Turkey with comparison of other population-based studies. While there were similarities and differences with different publications, our results did not show a marked tendency to the findings of any specific geographic region.

Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; adult; chromosomal abnormalities; cytogenetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. - PubMed
    1. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002;100(7):2292–302. - PubMed
    1. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114(5):937–951. - PubMed
    1. Shumilov E, Flach J, Kohlmann A, Banz Y, Bonadies N, et al. Current status and trends in the diagnostics of AML and MDS. Blood Rev. 2018;32(6):508–519. - PubMed
    1. Lazarevic VL, Johansson B. Why classical cytogenetics still matters in acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Review of Hematol. 2020;0(0):1–3. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources