Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;30(8):5215-5224.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13192-1. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Menstrual Phase and Menopausal Status Classification of Benign Breast Tissue Using Hormone-Regulated Gene Expression and Histomorphology: A Validation Study

Affiliations

Menstrual Phase and Menopausal Status Classification of Benign Breast Tissue Using Hormone-Regulated Gene Expression and Histomorphology: A Validation Study

Omid Hosseini et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The validation of breast cancer risk biomarkers in benign breast samples (BBS) is a long-sought goal, hampered by the fluctuation of gene and protein expression with menstrual phase (MP) and menopausal status (MS). Previously, we identified hormone-related gene expression and histomorphology parameters to classify BBS by MS/MP. We now evaluate both together, to validate our prior results.

Patients and methods: BBS were obtained from consenting women (86 premenopausal, 55 postmenopausal) undergoing reduction mammoplasty (RM) or contralateral unaffected breast (CUB) mastectomy. MP/MS was defined using classical criteria for menstrual dates and hormone levels on the day of surgery. BBS gene expression was measured with reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for three luteal phase (LP) genes (TNFSF11, DIO2, MYBPC1) and four menopausal genes (PGR, GREB1, TIFF1, CCND1). Premenopausal samples were classified into LP or non-LP, using published histomorphology parameters. Logistic regression and receiver-operator curve analysis was performed to assess area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of MP/MS.

Results: In all 131 women, menopausal genes plus age > 50 years predicted true MS [AUC 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 0.97]. Among premenopausal women, high TNFSF11 expression distinguished non-LP from LP samples (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91); the addition of histomorphology improved the prediction nonsignificantly (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.78, 0.96). In premenopausal subsets, addition of histomorphology improved LP prediction in RM (AUC 0.95, 95% CI 0.87, 1.0), but not in CUB (0.84, 95% CI 0.72, 0.96).

Conclusions: Expression of five-gene set accurately predicts menopausal status and menstrual phase in BBS, facilitating the development of breast cancer risk biomarkers using large, archived sample repositories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Vogel PM, Georgiade NG, Fetter BF, et al. The correlation of histologic changes in the human breast with the menstrual cycle. Am J Pathol. 1981;104(1):23–34. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Going JJ, Anderson TJ, Battersby S, et al. Proliferative and secretory activity in human breast during natural and artificial menstrual cycles. Am J Pathol. 1988;130:193–204. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, et al. Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):17–35. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soderqvist G. Effects of sex steroids on proliferation in normal mammary tissue. Ann Med. 1998;30(6):511–24. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hannah O, Heather Eliassen A, Wang M, Smith-Warner SA, Beck AH, Schnitt SJ, Collins LC, Connolly JL, Montaser-Kouhsari L, Polyak K, Tamimi RM. Expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki67 in normal breast tissue in relation to subsequent risk of breast cancer. npj Breast Cancer. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjbcancer.2016.32 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources