Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;33(7):4589-4596.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09474-7. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks

Raphael Sexauer et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: High breast density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and adapt two (MLO, CC) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for automatic breast density classification on synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions.

Methods: In total, 4605 synthetic 2D images (1665 patients, age: 57 ± 37 years) were labeled according to the ACR (American College of Radiology) density (A-D). Two DCNNs with 11 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers each, were trained with 70% of the data, whereas 20% was used for validation. The remaining 10% were used as a separate test dataset with 460 images (380 patients). All mammograms in the test dataset were read blinded by two radiologists (reader 1 with two and reader 2 with 11 years of dedicated mammographic experience in breast imaging), and the consensus was formed as the reference standard. The inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy measures of automated classification were evaluated.

Results: The two models for MLO and CC projections had a mean sensitivity of 80.4% (95%-CI 72.2-86.9), a specificity of 89.3% (95%-CI 85.4-92.3), and an accuracy of 89.6% (95%-CI 88.1-90.9) in the differentiation between ACR A/B and ACR C/D. DCNN versus human and inter-reader agreement were both "substantial" (Cohen's kappa: 0.61 versus 0.63).

Conclusion: The DCNN allows accurate, standardized, and observer-independent classification of breast density based on the ACR BI-RADS system.

Key points: • A DCNN performs on par with human experts in breast density assessment for synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. • The proposed technique may be useful for accurate, standardized, and observer-independent breast density evaluation of tomosynthesis.

Keywords: Breast density; Breast neoplasms; Deep learning; Mammography; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Maximization of diagnostic accuracy using the validation dataset by adjusting training hyperparameters over 200 epochs. Red shows the training accuracy; pink, the validation accuracy; blue, the training loss; and light blue, the validation loss
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Diagnostic accuracy of ACR density A-D classification with representative examples of each based on the test data set for the CC projections
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diagnostic accuracy of ACR density A-D classification with representative examples of each based on the test data set for the MLO projections
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic pattern of the applied multilayered deep convolutional neural network (dCNN), containing 11 convolutional layers 3 fully connected layers, 5 downsampling max-0 layers, and 2 dense layers with a Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Advani P, Moreno-Aspitia A. Current strategies for the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 2014;6:59–71. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S39114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wanders JOP, Holland K, Karssemeijer N, et al. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:67. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:268–278. doi: 10.7326/M15-1789. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korhonen KE, Conant EF, Cohen EA, et al. Breast cancer conspicuity on simultaneously acquired digital mammographic images versus digital breast tomosynthesis images. Radiology. 2019;292:69–76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed