Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Toripalimab Plus Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 36622553
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02402-z
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Toripalimab Plus Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Introduction: First-line treatment with toripalimab plus paclitaxel and cisplatin (TTP) is very effective for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China, although its effects on economic burden are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TTP from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
Methods: A Markov model was established to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment with TTP for patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Survival data were derived from the JUPITER-06 trial. The costs and utilities were gathered from the literature and a local database. The primary outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a willingness-to-pay (WTP). One-way and probability sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the robustness of the model.
Results: The total cost of TTP was $123,646.43 and gained 1.10 QALYs, while the paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) chemotherapy group yielded 0.84 QALY at cost of $16,259.65. First-line TTP treatment yielded an incremental cost of $7,386.78 with an additional 0.26 QALY, providing an ICER of $28,348.42/QALY, which was lower than the WTP threshold ($36,257.91) in China.
Conclusions: TTP was likely more cost-effective than TP chemotherapy from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. This study may provide evidence required to establish decision-making criteria to support guidance for cost-effective selection of an immunotherapeutic regimen.
Keywords: Cisplatin; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Paclitaxel; Toripalimab.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Feb;24(2):285-292. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2270159. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024. PMID: 37855081
-
Economic evaluation of toripalimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(6):683-690. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2206570. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023. PMID: 37086175
-
Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68399-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39085374 Free PMC article.
-
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545208 Review.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Front Immunol. 2023 May 4;14:1172242. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172242. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37215110 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 15;15:1225076. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1225076. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38813103 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in China.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1055727. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1055727. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36937861 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.10.3322/caac.21660 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:360–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023.10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Qiu H, Cao S, Xu R. Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41:1037–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12197.10.1002/cac2.12197 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, Li N, Chen WQ. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134:783–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus. 2019;16:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0642-8.10.1007/s10388-018-0642-8 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical