Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 36407808
- PMCID: PMC9635782
- DOI: 10.14740/gr1557
Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy.
Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage.
Results: We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I2 = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I2 = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I2 = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I2 = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I2 = 87%; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy.
Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Liver biopsy; Liver cirrhosis; Liver fibrosis; Transient elastography.
Copyright 2022, Malik et al.
Conflict of interest statement
None to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Transient elastography compared to liver biopsy for staging of liver fibrosis in primary biliary cholangitis.Ann Hepatol. 2023 Jul-Aug;28(4):101107. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101107. Epub 2023 Apr 23. Ann Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37088420
-
Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8692-8700. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1176. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 34488358
-
Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Liver Transpl. 2012 Mar;18(3):323-31. doi: 10.1002/lt.22460. Liver Transpl. 2012. PMID: 22140010 Review.
-
Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C.Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):638-48. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3046-0. Epub 2013 Oct 25. Eur Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24158528 Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Feb;43(4):458-69. doi: 10.1111/apt.13488. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016. PMID: 26669632 Review.
Cited by
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art diagnostic imaging.World J Radiol. 2023 Mar 28;15(3):56-68. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i3.56. World J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37035828 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Garcia-Compean D, Villarreal-Perez JZ, Cavazos MEO, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Borjas-Almaguer OD, Del Cueto-Aguilera AN, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JA. et al. Prevalence of liver fibrosis in an unselected general population with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Time for screening? Ann Hepatol. 2020;19(3):258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.01.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anthony PP, Ishak KG, Nayak NC, Poulsen HE, Scheuer PJ, Sobin LH. The morphology of cirrhosis. Recommendations on definition, nomenclature, and classification by a working group sponsored by the World Health Organization. J Clin Pathol. 1978;31(5):395–414. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.5.395. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Collaborators GBDC. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(3):245–266. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30349-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous