Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 26;10(10):2408.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102408.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Predicting Extrathyroidal Extension and Its Relation to Body Mass Index in a North American Population

Affiliations

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Predicting Extrathyroidal Extension and Its Relation to Body Mass Index in a North American Population

Mahmoud Omar et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Detection of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) influences treatment plan and surgical aggressiveness. Ultrasound (US) is the long-standing preoperative imaging method of choice. Recent literature from Asia suggests US accuracy to be influenced by patient characteristics, such as body mass index (BMI). Here, we examine the effect of BMI on the accuracy of US at a North American tertiary referral center. A total of 204 PTC-confirmed patients were retrospectively read by a radiologist blinded to surgical pathology findings. The radiologist recorded multiple sonographic features, including ETE, loss of echogenic capsule, nodule vascularity, capsular abutment, and bulging of contour. When considering all patients, the ultrasonographic feature with the best overall performance was loss of echogenic capsule (diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) = 4.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.86-10.78). Sub-group analysis by patient BMI found that area under the curve (AUC) for sonographic features was greater in non-obese BMI patients (0.71 ± 0.06) when compared with obese patients (0.43 ± 0.05; p = 0.001). Overall, US diagnostic performance was significantly better in non-obese (DOR = 3.70, 95%CI = 1.53-8.94) patients when compared to those who were obese (DOR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.62-2.03; p = 0.03). Loss of the echogenic capsule did not differ between the two cohorts with respect to DOR (p = 0.51), specificity (p = 0.52), or sensitivity (p = 0.09). Our work suggests that the diagnostic value of ETE detection by US is impaired in obese patients. Considering that loss of the echogenic capsule did not differ with respect to diagnostic performance, specificity, nor sensitivity between non-obese and obese patients, it could be considered the most important predictor of US-determined ETE.

Keywords: ETE; body mass index; extrathyroidal extension; papillary thyroid cancer; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pooled analysis of different sonographic features. The (A) sensitivity, (B) specificity, (C) diagnostic odds ratio, and (D) summary receiver operating curve are depicted. ETE: subjective suspicion of ETE, Capsular: abutment of the capsule, Contour: bulging of thyroid contour, Echogenic: loss of echogenic capsule, Vascularity: extension of vascularity beyond thyroid capsule. CI: confidence interval; DOR: diagnostic odds ratio; sROC: summary receiver operating curve; AUC: area under the curve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating curve (ROC) of sonographic features in assessing for ETE. The summary receiver operating curve for (A) non-obese and (B) obese patients are depicted. Area under the curve is reported with corresponding a standard error. ETE: subjective suspicion of ETE, Capsular: abutment of the capsule, Contour: bulging of thyroid contour, Echogenic: loss of echogenic capsule, Vascularity: extension of vascularity beyond thyroid capsule. sROC: summary receiver operating curve; AUC: area under the curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morris L.G., Sikora A.G., Tosteson T.D., Davies L. The Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer: The Influence of Access to Care. Thyroid. 2013;23:885–891. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamaya A., Tahvildari A.M., Patel B.N., Willmann J.K., Jeffrey R.B., Desser T.S. Sonographic Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. J. Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:2225–2230. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.02006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. La Vecchia C., Malvezzi M., Bosetti C., Garavello W., Bertuccio P., Levi F., Negri E. Thyroid Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Global Overview. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:2187–2195. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29251. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee C.Y., Kim S.J., Ko K.R., Chung K.-W., Lee J.-H. Predictive Factors for Extrathyroidal Extension of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on Preoperative Sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:231–238. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.2.231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orlov S., Orlov D., Shaytzag M., Dowar M., Tabatabaie V., Dwek P., Yip J., Hu C., Freeman J.L., Walfish P.G., et al. Influence of Age and Primary Tumor Size on the Risk for Residual/Recurrent Well-differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. Head Neck J. Sci. Spec. Head Neck. 2009;31:782–788. doi: 10.1002/hed.21020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources