Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 6;10(9):167.
doi: 10.3390/dj10090167.

Viability and Adhesion of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on a Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Combined with Collagen, Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Preclinical Pilot Study

Affiliations

Viability and Adhesion of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on a Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Combined with Collagen, Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Preclinical Pilot Study

Leonor C Espitia-Quiroz et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Conventional periodontal therapy relies on bone regeneration strategies utilizing scaffolds made of diverse materials, among which collagen, to promote cell adhesion and growth. Objective: To evaluate periodontal ligament fibroblast (HPdLF) cell adhesion and viability for periodontal regeneration purposes on hydroxyapatite scaffolds containing collagen (HAp-egg shell) combined with polylactic acid−polyglycolic acid copolymer (PLGA) and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF). Methods: Four variations of the HAp-egg shell were used to seed HPdLF for 24 h and evaluate cell viability through a live/dead assay: (1) (HAp-egg shell/PLGA), (2) (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + collagen), (3) (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + PRF) and (4) (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + PRF + collagen). Cell adhesion and viability were determined using confocal microscopy and quantified using central tendency and dispersion measurements; significant differences were determined using ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: Group 1 presented low cell viability and adhesion (3.70−10.17%); groups 2 and 3 presented high cell viability and low cell adhesion (group 2, 59.2−11.1%, group 3, 58−4.6%); group 4 presented the highest cell viability (82.8%) and moderate cell adhesion (45%) (p = 0.474). Conclusions: The effect of collagen on the HAp-egg shell/PLGA scaffold combined with PRF favored HPdLF cell adhesion and viability and could clinically have a positive effect on bone defect resolution and the regeneration of periodontal ligament tissue.

Keywords: collagen; fibroblasts; hydroxyapatite; periodontal ligament; platelet-rich fibrin; polylactic acid–polyglycolic acid copolymer; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental processes. (A) Human periodontal ligament fibroblasts culture; the cells show their characteristic spindle shape. (B) HAp-egg shell/PLGA scaffold used for all groups in the form of a 5 mm disc with 2 mm height. (C) Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), with gelatinous consistency, a characteristic of this biomaterial. (D) Experimental design in a 96-well plate, containing the HPdLF culture medium. (E) Figure illustrating the four evaluated groups: red (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF), blue (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + Collagen), yellow (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + PRF) and green (HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + Collagen + PRF).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images captured under a confocal fluorescence microscope (CFM); n = 3 (i, ii, iii). (A). HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF. (B). HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + Collagen. (C). HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + PRF. (D). HAp-egg shell/PLGA + HPdLF + PRF + Collagen. Live cells are green, dead cells are red.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison among the evaluated groups of cell adhesion (A) and viability (B). Mean ± SD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang H.L., Greenwell H., Fiorellini J., Giannobile W., Offenbacher S., Salkin L., Townsend C., Sheridan P., Genco R.J. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1601–1622. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson L., Decker A.M., Nibali L., Pilipchuk S.P., Berglundh T., Giannobile W.V. Regenerative Medicine for Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases. J. Dent. Res. 2016;95:255–266. doi: 10.1177/0022034515618887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosales-Ibáñez R., Alvarado-Estrada K.N., Ojeda-Gutiérrez F. Tissue Engineering in Dentistry. Rev. ADM. 2012;69:164–167.
    1. Mishra M., Mishra P., Shambharkar V., Raut A. Scaffolds in Periodontal Regeneration. J. Pharm. Biomed. Sc. 2016;6:10–17.
    1. Parra M., Haidar Z.S., Olate S. Use of PRF in Combination with Synthetic Filling Materials (HA and ß-TCP) for Bone Reconstructions. Avances en Odontoestomatologí-a. 2018;34:79–86.

LinkOut - more resources