Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;67(4):157-170.
doi: 10.1177/00369330221122300. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Predicting prognosis of heart failure using common malnutrition assessment tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Predicting prognosis of heart failure using common malnutrition assessment tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jianchao Ni et al. Scott Med J. 2022 Nov.

Retraction in

  • Retraction notice.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Scott Med J. 2024 Aug;69(3):99. doi: 10.1177/00369330241240826. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Scott Med J. 2024. PMID: 38656270 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background and aims: COUNT score, PNI score, and GNRI scores are associated with cardiovascular events. This review identifies the most accurate malnutrition assessment tools based on these scores in predicting mortality and readmission outcomes in HF patients.

Material and methods: PubMed via MEDLINE, EMBASE were searched to identify studies assessing malnutrition using CONUT, PNI and GNRI. A meta-analysis was carried out to pool the hazard ratios on mortality and readmission rates. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: The mortality in HF patients with malnutrition assessed by CONUT showed pooled HR of 1.23. HF patients with all severe, moderate, and mild risk of malnutrition showed mortality with HR 3.56, 2.71 and 1.57 respectively. For malnutrition assessed with GNRI, HF patients with all severe, moderate, and mild risk of malnutrition showed mortality with HR 4.17, 2.73 and 1.73 respectively. No significance difference in association of CONUT score with pooled HR of readmission rate was observed HR 0.99. With PNI, HF patients with all severe and moderate risk of malnutrition showed mortality with HR 2.14 and HR 1.68 respectively, although they failed to achieve significance.

Conclusion: CONUT and GNRI are the superior prognostic indicator than PNI in prediction of mortality associated with risk of malnutrition.

Keywords: CONUT; GNRI; Heart failure; PNI; malnutrition assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by