Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors
- PMID: 35939778
- PMCID: PMC9835932
- DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00078
Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors
Abstract
Purpose: Since 2016, the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer (CoC) has required routine distress screening (DS) of cancer survivors treated in their accredited facilities to facilitate early identification of survivors with psychosocial concerns. Lung and ovarian cancer survivors have relatively low 5-year survival rates and may experience high levels of distress. We examined the extent to which ovarian and lung cancer survivors received CoC-mandated DS and whether DS disparities exist on the basis of diagnosis, sociodemographic factors, or facility geography (urban/rural).
Methods: This study included a quantitative review of DS documentation and follow-up services provided using existing electronic health records (EHRs). We worked with 21 CoC-accredited facilities across the United States and examined EHRs of 2,258 survivors from these facilities (1,618 lung cancer survivors and 640 ovarian cancer survivors) diagnosed in 2016 or 2017.
Results: Documentation of DS was found in half (54.8%) of the EHRs reviewed. Disparities existed across race/ethnicity, cancer type and stage, and facility characteristics. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander survivors were screened at lower percentages than other survivors. Patients with ovarian cancer, those diagnosed at earlier stages, and survivors in urban facilities had relatively low percentages of DS. Non-Hispanic Black survivors were more likely than non-Hispanic White survivors to decline further psychosocial services.
Conclusion: Despite the mandate for routine DS in CoC-accredited oncology programs, gaps remain in how many and which survivors are screened for distress. Improvements in DS processes to enhance access to DS and appropriate psychosocial care could benefit cancer survivors. Collaboration with CoC during this study led to improvement of their processes for collecting DS data for measuring standard adherence.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to
Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (
No potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diving deeper into distress screening implementation in oncology care.J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(6):645-660. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2250774. Epub 2023 Sep 1. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37655693 Free PMC article.
-
Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33731095 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18736. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38958979 Free PMC article.
-
Online description of services provided in adult survivorship programs across U.S. accredited cancer centers.J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Feb;18(1):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18. J Cancer Surviv. 2024. PMID: 36933086 Review.
-
Using the science of psychosocial care to implement the new american college of surgeons commission on cancer distress screening standard.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Feb 1;11(2):214-21. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0028. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013. PMID: 23411387 Review.
Cited by
-
Diving deeper into distress screening implementation in oncology care.J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(6):645-660. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2250774. Epub 2023 Sep 1. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37655693 Free PMC article.
-
Causes of death among people living with metastatic cancer.Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 19;15(1):1519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45307-x. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38374318 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Psychosocial Distress: A Brief Review with Implications for Oncology Nursing.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;12(21):2167. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212167. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39517379 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incidence, Timing, and Factors Associated With Suicide Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer in the US.JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):308-315. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6549. JAMA Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36633854 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control : Cancer Survivors—Cancer Patients: Diagnosis and Treatment. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivors/patients/
-
- Zabora J, Knight L: The utility of psychosocial screening in primar care settings. Prim Care Cancer 21:50-53, 2001
-
- Zabora JR, Macmurray L: The history of psychosocial screening among cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 30:625-635, 2012 - PubMed
-
- Funk R, Cisneros C, Williams RC, et al. : What happens after distress screening? Patterns of supportive care service utilization among oncology patients identified through a systematic screening protocol. Support Care Cancer 24:2861-2868, 2016 - PubMed
-
- Carlson LE, Zelinski EL, Toivonen KI, et al. : Prevalence of psychosocial distress in cancer patients across 55 North American cancer centers. J Psychosoc Oncol 37:5-21, 2019 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical