Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1704-e1715.
doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00078. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors

Affiliations

Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors

Elizabeth A Rohan et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Since 2016, the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer (CoC) has required routine distress screening (DS) of cancer survivors treated in their accredited facilities to facilitate early identification of survivors with psychosocial concerns. Lung and ovarian cancer survivors have relatively low 5-year survival rates and may experience high levels of distress. We examined the extent to which ovarian and lung cancer survivors received CoC-mandated DS and whether DS disparities exist on the basis of diagnosis, sociodemographic factors, or facility geography (urban/rural).

Methods: This study included a quantitative review of DS documentation and follow-up services provided using existing electronic health records (EHRs). We worked with 21 CoC-accredited facilities across the United States and examined EHRs of 2,258 survivors from these facilities (1,618 lung cancer survivors and 640 ovarian cancer survivors) diagnosed in 2016 or 2017.

Results: Documentation of DS was found in half (54.8%) of the EHRs reviewed. Disparities existed across race/ethnicity, cancer type and stage, and facility characteristics. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander survivors were screened at lower percentages than other survivors. Patients with ovarian cancer, those diagnosed at earlier stages, and survivors in urban facilities had relatively low percentages of DS. Non-Hispanic Black survivors were more likely than non-Hispanic White survivors to decline further psychosocial services.

Conclusion: Despite the mandate for routine DS in CoC-accredited oncology programs, gaps remain in how many and which survivors are screened for distress. Improvements in DS processes to enhance access to DS and appropriate psychosocial care could benefit cancer survivors. Collaboration with CoC during this study led to improvement of their processes for collecting DS data for measuring standard adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/op/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

No potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Patterns of DS-related care among non-Hispanic White (n = 1,743) and non-Hispanic Black (n = 285) cancer survivors (N = 2,258; this analysis could only be conducted with non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black survivor data because of the small numbers of survivors of other races). aFour hundred six study participants were never eligible for DS because they did not reach the pivotal visit for DS, died before there was an opportunity for DS, or were sent to hospice. bOf those who were screened (total [n = 1,014]), 802 were non-Hispanic White survivors and 135 were non-Hispanic Black survivors. cOf those who were screened and screened positive for distress (total [n = 549]), 443 were non-Hispanic White survivors and 75 were non-Hispanic Black survivors. dOf those who were screened, screened positive for distress, and received assessment (total [n = 535]), 431 were non-Hispanic White survivors and 73 were non-Hispanic Black survivors; significant differences were observed between non-Hispanic White and Black survivors (P < .001). DS, distress screening.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control : Cancer Survivors—Cancer Patients: Diagnosis and Treatment. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivors/patients/
    1. Zabora J, Knight L: The utility of psychosocial screening in primar care settings. Prim Care Cancer 21:50-53, 2001
    1. Zabora JR, Macmurray L: The history of psychosocial screening among cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 30:625-635, 2012 - PubMed
    1. Funk R, Cisneros C, Williams RC, et al. : What happens after distress screening? Patterns of supportive care service utilization among oncology patients identified through a systematic screening protocol. Support Care Cancer 24:2861-2868, 2016 - PubMed
    1. Carlson LE, Zelinski EL, Toivonen KI, et al. : Prevalence of psychosocial distress in cancer patients across 55 North American cancer centers. J Psychosoc Oncol 37:5-21, 2019 - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding