Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1978 Sep;25(5):398-404.
doi: 10.1007/BF03006569.

A double-blind comparison of butorphanol and meperidine in labour: maternal pain relief and effect on the newborn

A L Maduska, M Hajghassemali
Clinical Trial

A double-blind comparison of butorphanol and meperidine in labour: maternal pain relief and effect on the newborn

A L Maduska et al. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1978 Sep.

Abstract

Butorphanol tartrate 1 mg and 2 mg were compared in 80 normal mothers at term in a double-blind study with meperidine hydrochloride 40 mg and 80 mg for the relief of pain in labour. Butorphanol was found to be as effective as meperidine in relieving pain in labour. The foetal condition, as measured by ECG monitoring, Apgar scores, time to sustained respiration, umbilical venous H+ (pH) and PCO2, and a general nursery survey were comparable for meperidine and butorphanol. No psychomimetic phenomena were seen. Assays indicated that both butorphanol and meperidine crossed the placenta. The mean concentration of butorphanol in neonatal serum was 0.84 times maternal serum at 1.5 to 3.5 hours after intramuscular administration of a single or two successive doses of butorphanol 1 mg or 2 mg to the mother. The mean concentrations for meperidine in neonatal serum was 0.89 times maternal serum at 0.85 to 3.6 hours after intramuscular administration of meperidine 40 mg or 80 mg to the mother. Neither analgesic caused severe depression of the infant except for one meperidine-treated case.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1970 May-Jun;11(3):385-403 - PubMed
    1. J Am Chem Soc. 1973 Nov 14;95(23):7910-2 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Jun;19(6):738-45 - PubMed
    1. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1976 Apr;220(2):258-68 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1964 Feb;143:141-8 - PubMed