Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;43(8):5143-5151.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06162-0. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Patient-reported outcome and cognitive measures to be used in vascular and brain tumor surgery: proposal for a minimum set

Affiliations

Patient-reported outcome and cognitive measures to be used in vascular and brain tumor surgery: proposal for a minimum set

Silvia Schiavolin et al. Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The standardization of outcome measures is needed for comparing studies and using common measures in clinical practice. We aimed to identify cognitive and patient-reported outcomes and timing of assessment for glioma, meningioma, and vascular surgery.

Method: A consensus study was conducted. Participants selected cognitive and patient-reported measures among a list of instruments identified through a literature search.

Results: Seventeen cognitive tests for the glioma and meningioma's evaluation, 8 for the vascular diseases, and one questionnaire on quality of life and one on emotional distress were identified. The timing of outcome assessment selected was before surgery, at discharge, and after 3 and 12 months for glioma; before surgery and after 3 months for meningioma; before surgery, at discharge, and after 6 months for vascular diseases.

Conclusion: The identification of common outcome measures is the first step toward a shared data collection improving the quality and comparability of future studies.

Keywords: Cognitive test; Consensus; Glioma; Meningioma; Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM); Vascular.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG et al (2010) The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 340:365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c365 - DOI
    1. Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ et al (2014) Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Trials 15:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-49 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Grinnon ST, Miller K, Marler JR et al (2012) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project-approach and methods. Clin Trials 9(3):322–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774512438980 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM et al (2012) Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 13:132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Papagno C, Casarotti A, Comi A et al (2012) Measuring clinical outcomes in neuro-oncology. A battery to evaluate low-grade gliomas (LGG). J Neurooncol 108(2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0824-5 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources