Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May 13;22(1):542.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09644-8.

Safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, cohort-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, cohort-controlled trial

Cunliang Wang et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) safety and efficacy in preventing hematological toxicity during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods: We retrospectively assessed 80 SCLC patients treated with CCRT from January 2013 to December 2018 who received PEG-rhG-CSF within 48 hours after the end of chemotherapy, defined as prophylactic use, as the experimental group. An additional 80 patients who were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF were matched 1:1 by the propensity score matching method and served as the control group. The main observations were differences in hematological toxicity, neutrophil changes, febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and adverse reactions. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with regular assessment and follow-up.

Results: The leukocyte, neutrophil, erythrocyte, and platelet counts and hemoglobin level decreased after CCRT, but the experimental group had slightly higher leukocyte and neutrophil counts than the control group (P < 0.05). The incidences of grade III-IV leukopenia (18.75% vs. 61.25%) and neutropenia (23.75% vs. 67.5%) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The absolute neutrophil count was 4.17 ± 0.79 (× 109/L) on day 1 and peaked 6.81 ± 2.37 (× 109/L) on day 10 in the experimental group; the value in the control group was 2.81 ± 0.86 (× 109/L) on day 1. It decreased significantly and reached the minimum 0.91 ± 0.53 (× 109/L) on day 10 (P < 0.05). The experimental group had a lower FN incidence than the control group (P < 0.05). There was also no significant acute esophagitis or pulmonary toxicity. The treatment had no significant effect on PFS (11.4 months vs. 8.7 months, P = 0.958) or OS (23.9 months vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.325) over an 18.6-month median follow-up time.

Conclusion: PEG-rhG-CSF has good efficacy and safety in preventing hematological toxicity in SCLC patients during CCRT and has no significant effects on PFS or OS.

Keywords: Febrile neutropenia; Hematological toxicity; PEG-rhG-CSF; Radiotherapy; Survival time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Blood count differences between the two groups. CCRT: concurrent chemoradiotherapy; WBC: white blood cell; ANC: absolute neutrophil count; RBC: red blood cell; PLT: platelet; HB: hemoglobin. * Factors with statistical significance: ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ANC dynamics in the two groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differences in myelosuppression. * Factors with statistical significance: ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radiological reactions, incidence of FN and other adverse reactions. RP: Radiation pneumonia, RE: Radiation esophagitis, FN: Febrile neutropenia. * Factors with statistical significance: ns: no significance; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS (A) and OS (B) of the two groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang X. Interpretation of CSCO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of small cell lung Cancer in 2020. J Clin Int Med. 2020;37(11):820–822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2020.11.021. - DOI
    1. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, Spitznagel EL, Piccirillo J. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(28):4539–4544. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4859. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen M, Wang LH. Clinical guidelines for radiotherapy of small cell lung Cancer in China (2020 edition) Chin J Radiat Oncol. 2020;29(08):608–614. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20200528-00285. - DOI
    1. Bunn PA, Crowley J, Kelly K, Hazuka MB, Beasley K, Upchurch C, Livingston R, Weiss GR, Hicks WJ, Gandara DR. Chemoradiotherapy with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a prospective phase III randomized study of the southwest oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(7):1632–1641. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1632. - DOI - PubMed
    1. C.M.A. Chinese Society of Hematology, H.B Chinese Medical Doctor Association, [Chinese guidelines for the clinical application of antibacterial drugs for agranulocytosis with fever (2020)] Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(12):969–978. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.12.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances