Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;39(4):669-676.
doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03244-8. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Ritonavir-Boosted Exposure of Kinase Inhibitors: an Open Label, Cross-over Pharmacokinetic Proof-of-Concept Trial with Erlotinib

Affiliations

Ritonavir-Boosted Exposure of Kinase Inhibitors: an Open Label, Cross-over Pharmacokinetic Proof-of-Concept Trial with Erlotinib

René J Boosman et al. Pharm Res. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Although kinase inhibitors (KIs) are generally effective, their use has a large impact on the current health care budget. Dosing strategies to reduce treatment costs are warranted. Boosting pharmacokinetic exposure of KIs metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 with ritonavir might result in lower doses needed and subsequently reduces treatment costs. This study is a proof-of-concept study to evaluate if the dose of erlotinib can be reduced by co-administration with ritonavir.

Methods: In this open-label, cross-over study, we compared the pharmacokinetics of monotherapy erlotinib 150 mg once daily (QD) (control arm) with erlotinib 75 mg QD plus ritonavir 200 mg QD (intervention arm). Complete pharmacokinetic profiles at steady-state were taken up to 24 h after erlotinib intake for both dosing strategies.

Results: Nine patients were evaluable in this study. For the control arm, the systemic exposure over 24 h, maximum plasma concentration and minimal plasma concentration of erlotinib were 29.3 μg*h/mL (coefficient of variation (CV):58%), 1.84 μg/mL (CV:60%) and 1.00 μg/mL (CV:62%), respectively, compared with 28.9 μg*h/mL (CV:116%, p = 0.545), 1.68 μg/mL (CV:68%, p = 0.500) and 1.06 μg/mL (CV:165%, p = 0.150) for the intervention arm. Exposure to the metabolites of erlotinib (OSI-413 and OSI-420) was statistically significant lower following erlotinib plus ritonavir dosing. Similar results regarding safety in both dosing strategies were observed, no grade 3 or higher adverse event was reported.

Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic exposure at a dose of 75 mg erlotinib when combined with the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir is similar to 150 mg erlotinib. Ritonavir-boosting is a promising strategy to reduce erlotinib treatment costs and provides a rationale for other expensive therapies metabolized by CYP3A4.

Keywords: CYP3A4; Erlotinib; pharmacokinetics; pharmacology; ritonavir-boosting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.J. Boosman, C.J. de Gooijer, S.L. Groenland, P. Baas, V. van der Noort and A.D.R. Huitema declare they have no conflict of interest to report.

J.A. Burgers attended advisory boards for Roche and received grants for the institute from MSD.

J.H. Beijnen has received payment for expert testimony for Hoyng Tokh Monegier (paid to their institution), is a part-time employee and (in)direct stockholder of Modra Pharmaceuticals and (jointly) holds a patent on oral taxane formulations, which are clinically developed by Modra Pharmaceuticals. Modra Pharmaceuticals is a small spin-off company of the Netherlands Cancer Institute. All of these conflicts are outside of the submitted work.

N. Steeghs provided consultation or attended advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma. N Steeghs received research grants for the institute from AB Science, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, ADCtherapeutics, Amgen, Array, Ascendis Pharma, Astex, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cantargia, Celgene, CellCentric, Cresecendo, Cytovation, Deciphera, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, InteRNA, Janssen/Johnson&Johnson, Kinate, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Numab, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Taiho, Takeda (outside the submitted work).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic overview of the trial design. QD: once daily
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concentration-time curves of monotherapy erlotinib (in black) and of the combination therapy of erlotinib and ritonavir (in gray) of A) erlotinib, B) OSI-413, C) OSI-420 and D) ritonavir. The error bars depict the standard error of the geometric mean in one direction

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Faehling M, Schwenk B, Kramberg S, Eckert R, Volckmar A-L, Stenzinger A, et al. Oncogenic driver mutations, treatment, and EGFR-TKI resistance in a Caucasian population with non-small cell lung cancer: survival in clinical practice. Oncotarget. 2017;8(44):77897–77914. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20857. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shih YC, Smieliauskas F, Geynisman DM, Kelly RJ, Smith TJ. Trends in the cost and use of targeted Cancer therapies for the privately insured nonelderly: 2001 to 2011. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2190–2196. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.2320. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verheijen RB, Yu H, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Steeghs N, Huitema ADR. Practical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors in oncology. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;102(5):765–776. doi: 10.1002/cpt.787. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teo YL, Ho HK, Chan A. Metabolism-related pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: current understanding, challenges and recommendations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(2):241–253. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12496. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European medicines agency. Tarceva: EPAR-Product information 2019.

LinkOut - more resources