Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 24:10:793312.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.793312. eCollection 2022.

Bushfire Smoke in Our Eyes: Community Perceptions and Responses to an Intense Smoke Event in Canberra, Australia

Affiliations

Bushfire Smoke in Our Eyes: Community Perceptions and Responses to an Intense Smoke Event in Canberra, Australia

Rebecca Williamson et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

The 2019-20 bushfires that raged in eastern Australia were an overwhelming natural disaster leading to lives lost or upended, and communities destroyed. For almost a month, Canberra, Australia's capital city in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), was obscured by smoke from fires which threatened the outer suburbs. While smoke itself is experientially different from many natural disasters, it nevertheless poses a significant public health threat. As the impact of extended bushfire smoke in an urban setting is relatively unexplored we aimed to capture the individual and community-level experiences of the event and their importance for community and social functioning. We responded rapidly by conducting semi-structured interviews with a range of Canberra residents who, due to their personal or social circumstances, were potentially vulnerable to the effects of the smoke. Three major themes emerging from the narratives depicted disruption to daily life, physical and psychological effects, and shifting social connectedness. This study highlighted the ambiguous yet impactful nature of a bushfire smoke event, and identified four simple key messages that may be critically relevant to policy making in preparation for similar smoke events in the future.

Keywords: bushfire smoke; community; disaster; qualitative; social capital; social connectedness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Commonwealth of Australia . Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements Report. (2020).
    1. Lockie S. Sociological responses to the bushfire and climate crises. Environ Sociol. (2020) 6:1–5. 10.1080/23251042.2020.1726640 - DOI
    1. Vardoulakis S, Marks G, Abramson MJ. Lessons learned from the australian bushfires: climate change, air pollution, and public health. JAMA Intern Med. (2020) 180:635–6. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ulpiani G, Ranzi G, Santamouris M. Experimental evidence of the multiple microclimatic impacts of bushfires in affected urban areas: the case of Sydney during the 2019/2020 Australian season. Environ Res Commun. (2020) 2:065005. 10.1088/2515-7620/ab9e1a - DOI
    1. Vardoulakis S, Jalaludin BB, Morgan GG, Hanigan IC, Johnston FH. Bushfire smoke: urgent need for a national health protection strategy. Med J Austral. (2020) 212:349–53.e41. 10.5694/mja2.50511 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types