Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 22:9:791446.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.791446. eCollection 2022.

The Prescription Characteristics, Efficacy and Safety of Spironolactone in Real-World Patients With Acute Heart Failure Syndrome: A Prospective Nationwide Cohort Study

Affiliations

The Prescription Characteristics, Efficacy and Safety of Spironolactone in Real-World Patients With Acute Heart Failure Syndrome: A Prospective Nationwide Cohort Study

Soo Jin Na et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Randomized clinical trials of spironolactone showed significant mortality reduction in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, its role in acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS) is largely unknown.

Aim: To investigate the prescription characteristics, efficacy and safety of spironolactone in real-world patients with AHFS.

Methods: 5,136 AHFS patients who survived to hospital discharge using a nationwide prospective registry in Korea were analyzed. The primary efficacy outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality.

Results: Spironolactone was prescribed in 2,402 (46.8%) at discharge: <25 mg in 890 patients (37.1%), ≥25 mg, and <50 mg in 1,154 patients (48.0%), and ≥50 mg in 358 patients (14.9%). Patients treated with spironolactone had a lower proportion of chronic renal failure and renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and had lower serum creatinine level than those who did not. In overall patients, 3-year mortality was not different in both groups (35.9 vs. 34.5%, P = 0.279). The incidence of renal injury and hyperkalemia was 2.2% and 4.3%, respectively, at the first follow-up visit. The treatment effect of spironolactone on mortality was different across subpopulations according to LVEF. The use of spironolactone was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year morality in patients with LVEF ≤ 26% (33.8 vs. 44.3%, P < 0.001; adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97, P = 0.023), but not in patients with LVEF > 26%.

Conclusions: Although spironolactone was frequently used at lower doses in real-world practice, use of spironolactone significantly reduced 3-year mortality in patients with severely reduced LVEF with acceptable safety profile. However, our findings remain prone to various biases and further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: acute heart failure syndrome; drug therapy; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; outcome; spironolactone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Bar graph and (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of the 3-year all-cause mortality after hospital discharge according to spironolactone treatment in overall patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis of the treatment effect of spironolactone as measured by (A) 3-year all-cause mortality, (B) difference in 3-year all-cause mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A,C) Bar graph and (B,D) Kaplan–Meier curves of the 3-year all-cause mortality after hospital discharge according to spironolactone treatment in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 26% and in patients with LVEF > 26%.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bar graph and Kaplan–Meier curves of the 3-year all-cause mortality after hospital discharge according to spironolactone treatment in patients with (A) heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), (B) heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and (C) heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sztechman D, Czarzasta K, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A, Szczepanska-Sadowska E, Zera T. Aldosterone and mineralocorticoid receptors in regulation of the cardiovascular system and pathological remodelling of the heart and arteries. J Physiol Pharmacol. (2018) 69:829–45. 10.26402/jpp.2018.6.01 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, et al. . The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized aldactone evaluation study investigators. N Engl J Med. (1999) 341:709–17. 10.1056/nejm199909023411001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, Breathett K, Butler J, Davis LL, et al. . 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a report of the american college of cardiology solution set oversight committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2021) 77:772–810. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. . 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:3599–726. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 - DOI - PubMed
    1. FDA . FDA Briefing document cardiovascular and renal drugs advisory committee meeting december 16, 2020: spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/media/144411/download (accessed December 16, 2020).