Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;12(2):11397-11409.
doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2008698.

Specificity protein 1/microRNA-92b forms a feedback loop promoting the migration and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Specificity protein 1/microRNA-92b forms a feedback loop promoting the migration and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Pai Pang et al. Bioengineered. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

In this study we report a novel specificity protein 1 (SP1)/microRNA-92b (miR-92b) feedback loop regulating the migration and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Microarray and real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) were used to detect gene expression in HNSCC tissues and cell lines. Transwell migration, invasion, wound healing and cell counting kit - 8 (CCK-8) cell assays were used to compare cell migration, invasion and proliferation abilities. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used to detect SP1 binding to the miR-92b promoter. Western blot was used to detect protein levels. An in vivo tumorigenesis experiment was used to evaluate the effect of SP1 knockdown on tumor growth and protein levels were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We found that the miR-92b expression level was elevated in HNSCC primary focus tissue compared with adjacent normal tissue, and a higher level of miR-92b was related to a higher clinical stage and worse prognosis of HNSCC patients. MiR-92b and SP1 mutually promoted each expression and cooperatively facilitated the migration, invasion and proliferation of HNSCC cells. A decreased level of SP1/miR-92b resulted in a restraint of in vivo tumor growth. In conclusion, our results suggest that the SP1/miR-92b feedback loop generally promotes HNSCC invasion and metastasis, thus presenting a possible therapeutic target in the treatment of HNSCC patients.

Keywords: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; feedback loop; microRNA-92b; migration and invasion; specificity protein 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
MiR-92b promotes HNSCC cell migration, invasion and proliferation. (a) Microarray results show that miR-92b expression levels are higher in PCI-4B and PCI-37B cells than in PCI-4A and PCI-37A cells; (b) MiR-92b expression in HNSCC cells verified by real-time qPCR; (c) MiR-92b expression levels in cells transfected with miR-92b mimics, inhibitor and NC; (d) Mir-92b promotes migratory ability of PCI-37A/B cells, scale bar 50 µm; (e) Mir-92b promotes invasive ability of PCI-37A/B cells, scale bar 50 µm; (f) Wound healing images of PCI-37A/B cells transfected with miR-92b mimics, inhibitor and NC at 0, 24 and 48 hours after scratch, scale bar 100 µm; (g) In CCK8 assay, an increase in miR-92b expression in PCI-37A cells significantly promotes cell viability at 48 and 72 hours after transfection, and a decrease in miR-92b expression in PCI-37B cells inhibits proliferation at 24, 48 and 72 hours after transfection. All experiments were repeated at least three times. *p < 0.05 compared with the NC group; **p < 0.01 compared with the NC group; ***p <0.001 compared with the NC group
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
MiR-92b levels are associated with HNSCC progression and metastasis. (a) MiR-92b expression levels in HNSCC patient specimens. (b) Expression levels of miR-92b in adjacent normal tissue, primary tumor and metastatic focus in HNSCC patients from TCGA-HNSC dataset, p<0.0001; (c) MiR-92b expression in stage I&II versus stage III&IV HNSCC patients, p=0.012; (d) MiR-92b expression in N0 versus N+ HNSCC patients, p=0.004; (e) Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival probabilities of HNSCC patients with high and low miR-92b levels in primary tumors, p=0.031. All experiments were repeated at least three times. *p<0.05 compared with the NC group p<0.05; **p<0.01 compared with the NC group; ****p<0.0001 compared with the NC group
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
SP1 and miR-92b form a positive feedback loop in HNSCC cells. (a) Five possible SP1 binding sites on miR-92b promoter region identified via bioinformatics analysis; (b) SP1 mRNA expression levels in SP1 siRNA and NC groups of PCI-37A/B cells; (c) SP1 protein levels in SP1 siRNA and NC groups of PCI-37A/B cells; (d) Downregulating SP1 expression causes a decrease of miR-92b levels; (e) The SP1 expression levels increase with the increase of miR-92b levels in HNSCC patients’ specimens in TCGA-HNSC dataset, p<0.0001; (f) ChIP assay verifies that SP1 binds to the predicted site 1-3 in miR-92b promoter: (M) marker, (A) experiment group, (B) RT-Input1, (C) negative control group, (D) PCR negative control, (E) positive control group, (F) RT-Input2; (g) Downregulating SP1 expression results in a decrease of cell migratory and invasive abilities in PCI-37A/B cells, scale bar 50 µm; (h) Wound healing images of PCI-37A/B cells transfected with SP1 siRNA and control groups at 0, 24 and 48 hours after scratch, scale bar 100 µm; (i) Proliferation of PCI-4A/37A cells transfected with SP1 siRNA or control groups at 24, 48 and 72 hours after transfection; (j) SP1 mRNA expression levels in PCI-37A/B cells after transfected with miR-92b mimics and inhibitor; (k) SP1 protein levels in PCI-37A/B cells transfected with miR-92b mimics, inhibitor and control groups. All experiments were repeatedat least three times. *p<0.05 compared with the NC group; **p<0.01 compared with the NC group; ***p<0.001 compared with the NC group
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
SP1/miR-92b feedback loop affects tumor growth in vivo. (a) SP1 protein levels in blank control, SP1 control and SP1knockdown group cells; (b) MiR-92b levels in xenograft tumors of blank control, SP1 control and SP1 knockdown groups; (c) HE staining and immunohistochemistry staining of SP1 in xenograft tumors of blank control, SP1 control and SP1knockdown groups, scale bar 50um. (d) Images of xenograft tumor of blank control, SP1 control and SP1 knock-down groups; (e) In vivo tumor growth of the blank control, SP1 control and SP1 knockdown groups; All experiments were repeated at least three times. **Compared with the NC group p<0.01; ***Compared with the NC group p<0.001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Magnes T, Wagner S, Kiem D, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4981. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wicker CA, Takiar V, Suganya R, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant network proteins as novel prognostic biomarkers for head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2020;111:104949. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkie MD, Chudek DA, Flynn CD, et al. Outcomes and prognosticators in regionally recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(11):2035–2041. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grants (No. 81372877); Basic scientific research projects of colleges of Liaoning Province (No. LQNK201725); Key research and development guidance program in Liaoning Province (No. 2017225037); Scientific project of Shenyang City (No. 17-230-9-12); Youth Science and technology innovation plan of Shenyang city (RC170489); Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning province (2020-BS-113).