Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 26:13:8855-8863.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S335701. eCollection 2021.

Screening History in Vaginal Precancer and Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 2131 Cases in China

Affiliations

Screening History in Vaginal Precancer and Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 2131 Cases in China

Lu Zhang et al. Cancer Manag Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the screening history of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) and vaginal cancer.

Patients and methods: We included women with histologically confirmed VaIN or vaginal cancer by colposcopy-directed biopsy between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019. The results of cytology, hrHPV, colposcopic examination and history of hysterectomy were retrospectively analysed.

Results: A total of 26,432 colposcopies were performed during the study period, among which 2131 women (1835 [86.1%] with VaIN 1; 268 [12.6%] with VaIN 2/3; and 28 [1.3%] with vaginal cancer) were retrospectively studied. hrHPV test positivity was significantly higher than that of cytology for VaIN 1 (84.4% vs 67.3%; P < 0.001) and VaIN 2/3 (92.0% vs 79.9%; P < 0.001) but not for vaginal cancer (84.6% vs 78.6%; P = 0.73). Additionally, the concordance rates for colposcopic impression were 79.5%, 54.5%, and 92.8% for VaIN1, VaIN2/3, and vaginal cancer, respectively. All 372 patients had a history of hysterectomy, and 81.0% (282/348) of indications were related to cervical precancer and cancer. Although cytology test positivity was significantly higher in patients with hysterectomy than in patients without hysterectomy (76.2% vs 67.5%; P < 0.001), cytology combined with hrHPV can help to detect more than 95% of VaIN and vaginal cancer cases in both groups (96.2% for patients with hysterectomy and 96.5% for patients without hysterectomy).

Conclusion: VaIN and vaginal cancer are not rare diseases. Although cytology was sensitive (67.5%-76.2%) for detecting vaginal lesions regardless of hysterectomy, cytology combined with hrHPV improves detection accuracy up to 95% in both groups.

Keywords: colposcopy; cytology; human papilloma virus; vaginal cancer; vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The positivity of cytology, hrHPV and cotesting in VaIN and vaginal cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of hrHPV in VaIN and vaginal cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bertoli HK, Thomsen LT, Iftner T, et al. Risk of vulvar, vaginal and anal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer according to cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) status: a population-based prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(2):456–462. PMID: 32008794. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bogani G, Martinelli F, Ditto A, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) persistence and HPV 31 predict the risk of recurrence in high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:157–165. PMID: 28039759. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Vuyst H, Clifford GM, Nascimento MC, et al. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(7):1626–1636. PMID: 19115209. doi:10.1002/ijc.24116 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cong Q, Song Y, Wang Q, et al. A retrospective study of cytology, high-risk HPV, and colposcopy results of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:5894801. PMID: 29854768; PMCID: PMC5964579. doi:10.1155/2018/5894801 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137(4):516–542. PMID: 22431528. doi:10.1309/AJCPTGD94EVRSJCG - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

No external funding from private or public organizations were received for the conduct of this study or the preparation of this manuscript.